Meghan Markle has been criticised for what royal biographer Richard Fitzwilliam described as an “absolutely tasteless” decision. The criticism came after the Duchess of Sussex appeared at Oprah Winfrey’s book club session in California, a decision Fitzwilliam called a “terrible mistake”.
In an interview with GB NewsFitzwilliam expressed his disapproval, saying: “I think it was an absolutely terrible choice of venue to appear, especially on a very special anniversary.” He highlighted the fact that the appearance brought back memories of Meghan and Prince Harry’s infamous interview with Oprah, which aired while Prince Philip was hospitalised.
“We know she died shortly afterwards,” he added, further underlining the sensitivity surrounding the event. Fitzwilliam did not mince his words, referring to the Oprah interview as “like a nuclear weapon going off in the courtyard of Buckingham Palace.” He noted the aftermath, especially Queen Elizabeth’s low-key but blunt response: “What is remembered is the Queen’s comments. ‘Some recollections may vary’ sums it up very well. But that was an absolutely tasteless place to be.”
She also commented on Meghan’s friendship with Oprah, noting: “We know Meghan and Oprah are friends, but to be seen in a place that brought back memories of that interview on that anniversary is just extraordinary.” Fitzwilliam expressed particular interest surprise at the moment, given Meghan’s history with the event and the emotions it stirred within the royal family.
Coinciding with this controversy, Netflix announced the premiere date and title of Prince Harry’s upcoming polo segment, which coincided with a major update from Kate Middleton. On the same day, Kate shared the news on Instagram that her cancer treatment had concluded, adding another layer of complexity to the public’s perception of the timing of Meghan and Harry’s activities. Markle’s appearance at the event, in light of the infamous Oprah interview, has come under widespread scrutiny, with many questioning the appropriateness of the timing.
