Meghan Markle’s aspiration to be a “superstar” influenced her and Prince Harry’s approach to royal life, differing significantly from the quieter, non-royal lives led by Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, according to a royal expert. Unlike the princesses, who managed to forge private careers while occasionally participating in royal events, Meghan sought a more prominent public role.
Meghan and Harry’s desire to be “half-in, half-out” members of the Royal Family – maintaining their royal status while building independent careers – was a central aspect of their plan after their wedding. However, this proposal was ultimately rejected by Queen Elizabeth, leading the couple to make the decision to step down from their senior royal positions in 2020, she said. daily express.
Speaking about the claims, royal commentator Jane Barr wrote in the newsletter From Berkshire to Buckingham that the Duchess of Sussex “would not have been happy with the ultimately quiet or truly independent/non-royal lives that William and Harry’s cousins actually live. ”.
She explained“Looking back at Megxit, Harry was not just the Queen’s grandson, the same relationship that all his cousins had with the sovereign, he was the son of the future King.” Jane added: “The second difference is what Harry and Meghan were looking for, which was nothing like the situation of any of his family members.”
The expert said Beatrice and Eugenie “maintain regular jobs” and not “ostentatiously high-value partnerships with giant entertainment corporations.” On the other hand, “Meghan wanted to take her HRH and her title and be a superstar in her own sphere on the international stage, completely separate from the control of the Crown.”
This decision to resign has been a point of contention and debate among observers and followers of the royal family. Harry and Meghan’s supporters in California and around the world have often argued that the couple’s desire for independence was unfairly rejected, especially compared to the freedoms Beatrice and Eugenie enjoyed.
These princesses have been allowed to follow their own professional paths with much less scrutiny and obligation to royal duties. The expert’s claim suggests that Meghan’s ambitions went beyond simply seeking independence; She aspired to a level of fame and influence that was incompatible with the more moderate roles normally expected of royals who are not direct heirs to the throne.
This intention put her on a collision course with the expectations and traditions of the royal establishment, culminating in the couple’s dramatic and highly publicized departure from the United Kingdom. This narrative continues to fuel debates about the balance between duty and personal freedom within the Royal Family and the evolving role of the monarchy in modern society. As Meghan and Harry continue to establish their new lives in the United States, the debate over their royal exit remains a poignant topic among royal watchers and the public alike.
