Home Money Burberry boss ousted after sales slump, shares fall to lowest level since 2010

Burberry boss ousted after sales slump, shares fall to lowest level since 2010

0 comments
Sacked: Burberry said Jonathan Akeroyd (pictured with supermodel Naomi Campbell) will be replaced by former Jimmy Choo boss Joshua Schulman

Burberry shares fell to their lowest level since 2010 after its boss resigned after just two years at the helm.

On a gloomy day for the troubled British fashion brand, it was announced that Jonathan Akeroyd would be replaced by former Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo boss Joshua Schulman, who was handed a £9.2m “golden handout”.

The FTSE 100 company also scrapped its dividend as it warned it was on track to post losses in the first half of the year.

Shares fell 16 percent, bringing the stock’s value to nearly 50 percent of what it was at the beginning of this year and 70 percent of last year’s peak.

The company, famed for its checked and trench coat designs, is now valued at just £2.6bn, after being worth £5.7bn when Akeroyd took over in March 2022.

Sacked: Burberry said Jonathan Akeroyd (pictured with supermodel Naomi Campbell) will be replaced by former Jimmy Choo boss Joshua Schulman

“Losing 70 percent of its market value in just over a year is embarrassing for Burberry, given that it is supposed to be one of the world’s brightest luxury brands,” said Dan Coatsworth, an analyst at AJ Bell.

“If the actions of the person running the company don’t produce results, he is shown the door.”

Akeroyd’s dismissal comes just days after another British luxury brand, Mulberry, fired its boss, Thierry Andretta, underlining the scale of the crisis gripping the industry.

And Burberry’s shares have fallen so low that there is growing speculation that it has become a takeover target, possibly for LVMH.

In a statement to the stock exchange yesterday, Burberry said Akeroyd had left the company “with immediate effect and by mutual agreement with the board of directors.”

Chairman Gerry Murphy said his replacement was “a proven leader” with a CV that would be “key to realising Burberry’s full potential”.

Schulman ran handbag maker Michael Kors from 2021 to 2022 and luxury shoe brand Jimmy Choo from 2007 to 2012.

He will receive a salary of up to £9.2m for taking the job, including £3.6m in shares on top of his £1.2m salary and £4.4m in potential bonuses.

Akeroyd was paid £1.1m last year but did not receive a bonus due to the club’s poor performance.

His departure was announced with a shock sales update that showed Burberry’s revenue in the first quarter of its financial year to June 29 amounted to £458m, down 21 per cent on the previous year.

One of its largest markets, China, has been particularly tough, with sales down 23 percent in the Asia Pacific region.

It warned it was heading for a loss for the first half and lower-than-expected profits for the full year if operations continued to be so poor.

Murphy insisted he was taking “decisive action” to lure back customers after a “disappointing” performance.

In addition to suspending dividend payments to shore up its balance sheet, it said it was considering job cuts and other cost savings.

Akeroyd attempted to take the brand upmarket and cut prices to clear unsold stock, but this appears to have cost it its must-have appeal.

In recent collections, creative director Daniel Lee has sought to return the brand to its roots by focusing on its signature check print and staples such as the £1,900 beige trench coat.

But Burberry’s share price collapse has sparked speculation that the company could be taken over by a rival or that private equity predators could swoop on the 168-year-old label.

…and his future at Footsie is also at risk

Burberry’s share price plunge has put the company on track to be ousted from the FTSE 100 index of Britain’s biggest listed companies.

Analysts said it is likely to lose its blue-chip status at its next review in September, having seen its value fall to just £2.6bn.

The luxury goods sector has suffered from slowing demand, especially in China, but Burberry has fared worse than its rivals.

Its shares have fallen 47 percent this year, while those of British firm Mulberry have fallen 41 percent.

On the mainland, however, Cartier owner Richemont is up 18 percent, Hermes is up 10 percent, while Louis Vuitton owner LVMH is down just 4 percent.

Even Kering – the group behind the troubled Gucci brand – is down just 19 percent.

Susannah Streeter of Hargreaves Lansdown said Burberry was “not yet strong enough to reach into the heart of the most resilient segment of the luxury market”.

Burberry and Mulberry also pointed out the absence of VAT-free shopping for visitors to their UK stores.

DIY INVESTMENT PLATFORMS

Easy investment and ready-to-use portfolios

AJ Bell

Easy investment and ready-to-use portfolios

AJ Bell

Easy investment and ready-to-use portfolios

Free investment ideas and fund trading

Hargreaves Lansdown

Free investment ideas and fund trading

Hargreaves Lansdown

Free investment ideas and fund trading

Flat rate investing from £4.99 per month

interactive investor

Flat rate investing from £4.99 per month

interactive investor

Flat rate investing from £4.99 per month

Stock Investing: Community of Over 30 Million

eToro

Stock Investing: Community of Over 30 Million

eToro

Stock Investing: Community of Over 30 Million

Free and commission-free stock trading per account

Trade 212

Free and commission-free stock trading per account

Trade 212

Free and commission-free stock trading per account

Affiliate links: If you purchase a product This is Money may earn a commission. These offers are chosen by our editorial team as we believe they are worth highlighting. This does not affect our editorial independence.

Compare the best investment account for you

You may also like