Home US ‘Fuck the King’: Furious moment Trump supporters clash with British couple outside his hush money trial in New York as police escort them after they visited ‘purely for entertainment’

‘Fuck the King’: Furious moment Trump supporters clash with British couple outside his hush money trial in New York as police escort them after they visited ‘purely for entertainment’

0 comment
A British woman and her partner were allegedly chased out of a New York City park by a group of Donald Trump supporters protesting near his hush money trial.

This is the moment a British woman and her partner ran out of a New York City park after a group of Donald Trump supporters shouted “fuck off.”

The video shows how police were forced to intervene after protesters in a park near Trump’s hush money trial apparently clashed with the couple.

Angry protesters, dressed in Trump gear and waving MAGA flags, shouted “fuck the Queen” and “fuck the King” as the couple tried to leave the park. One protester, while being restrained by an officer, called the woman a “fucking idiot” and told her to “burn in hell, you fucking liberal.”

While it’s unclear what sparked the ugly confrontation, NYPD officers were seen trying to separate the Trump supporters and the couple.

Despite the profanity-laced tirade, the English woman seemed largely unfazed by the exchange, calling the supporters “disgusting people” and revealing that she and her partner had come to the rally “purely for entertainment.”

The chaotic fight comes as jurors in Trump’s trial have begun their second day of deliberations after failing to reach a quick verdict.

A British woman and her partner were allegedly chased out of a New York City park by a group of Donald Trump supporters protesting near his hush money trial.

An apparently angry protester, while being held down by police, called the woman a 'fucking moron' and told her to 'burn in hell, you fucking liberal.'

One apparently angry protester, while being held down by police, called the woman a ‘fucking moron’ and told her to ‘burn in hell, you fucking liberal.’

The British woman was seen smiling and almost laughing as the crowd surrounded her in the park, shouting profanities.

‘Disgusting, isn’t it? What disgusting people! » She said with a somewhat cheerful tone.

Her partner, apparently less amused, was leading her away from the group.

“We were actually here just for entertainment,” the woman told the media as they walked away from the rowdy protesters.

“We are from England,” he added, while his partner said “we have to move forward.”

Protesters continued shouting, telling the couple to “drink your tea” and “get out of my park.”

An angry protester, who called the woman an “asshole”, appeared to walk after her, but was stopped by a police officer who blocked her with his arm and told her: “She’s leaving, just stop.”

When the couple arrived at the park entrance, the woman, speaking to the media, added that she and her partner “enjoy watching Trump on television.”

It is unclear if the couple were asked to leave the park on the left of their own free will.

DailyMail.com reached out to the NYPD for more information, but a spokesperson said there was no complaint report on file.

These protesters shouted at the couple: 'Fuck the Queen' and 'fuck the King'.

These protesters shouted at the couple: ‘Fuck the Queen’ and ‘fuck the King’.

The woman's partner is seen leading her away from the commotion as protesters shout vulgar profanities at her.

The woman’s partner is seen leading her away from the commotion as protesters shout vulgar profanities at her.

However, the English woman seemed quite unfazed by the exchange and told the media that they had come to the demonstration

However, the English woman seemed largely unfazed by the exchange, telling the media that they had come to the rally “purely for entertainment.” And she added: ‘Disgusting, isn’t it? What disgusting people’

Protesters gathered in the park as jury deliberations in Trump’s criminal trial entered their second day Thursday.

The panel deliberated for four and a half hours Tuesday and sent two notes to the judge before sending him home.

They asked Judge Juan Merchán to read four parts of the testimony of Michael Cohen and former national investigator David Pecker.

The former president is trapped inside the court awaiting the verdict.

Trump struck a downbeat tone after leaving the courtroom following the reading of jury instructions Wednesday, saying that “Mother Teresa could not defeat these charges.”

money-trial.html">

DO YOU KNOW THE BRITISH COUPLE?

Please send an email natasha.anderson@mailonline.co.uk and tips@dailymail.co.uk

When he returned to court Thursday, he called it a “sad day for America.”

At the center of the charges are reimbursements paid to Cohen for a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in exchange for not going public with her claim about a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006.

Prosecutors say the refunds were falsely recorded as “legal expenses” to conceal the true nature of the transactions.

Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, charges punishable by up to four years in prison. He has denied any wrongdoing and has pleaded not guilty.

To convict Trump, the jury would have to unanimously determine that he created a fraudulent entry in his company’s records or caused another person to do so and that he acted with the intent to commit or conceal another crime.

Prosecutors say Trump committed or concealed a violation of a New York election law that makes it illegal for two or more conspirators to “promote or prevent the election of any person to public office by unlawful means.”

While jurors must unanimously agree that something illegal was done to promote Trump’s election campaign, they do not have to be unanimous about what was illegal.

The jurors, a diverse cross-section of Manhattan residents and professional backgrounds, often seemed fascinated by the trial testimonies, including those of Cohen and Daniels.

Many took notes and watched closely as witnesses answered questions from prosecutors and Trump’s lawyers.

Donald Trump (pictured in court today) faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, charges punishable by up to four years in prison. He denied all wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty.

Donald Trump (pictured in court today) faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, charges punishable by up to four years in prison. He denied all wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty.

Jurors began deliberating after a marathon day of closing arguments in which one prosecutor spoke for more than five hours, underscoring the burden the district attorney’s office faces in having to establish Trump’s guilt beyond beyond all reasonable doubt.

Trump’s team does not need to prove his innocence to avoid a conviction, but must count on at least one juror determining that prosecutors have not sufficiently proven their case.

In their first communication with the court, jurors asked to rehear testimony from Cohen and former National Enquirer editor David Pecker about a meeting with Trump in August 2015 at Trump Tower, where the tabloid boss accepted be the “eyes and ears” of his incipient presidential campaign.

Pecker testified that the plan included identifying potentially damaging stories about Trump so they could squash them before publishing them. That, prosecutors say, was the beginning of the trap-and-kill plot at the center of the case.

Jurors also want to hear Pecker’s account of a phone call she said she received from Trump in which they discussed a rumor that another outlet had offered to buy former Playboy model Karen McDougal’s story that she had a year-long affair with Trump in the mid-2000s. Trump has denied the affair.

Pecker testified that Trump told her, “Karen is a good girl” and asked her, “What do you think I should do?”

Pecker said he responded, “I think you should buy the story and take it off the market.” She added that Trump told her that he doesn’t buy stories because they always come out and that Cohen would be in touch.

The editor said he came away from the conversation thinking Trump was aware of the details of McDougal’s claims. Pecker said he believed the story was true and that it would have been embarrassing for Trump and his campaign if it had become public.

At the center of the charges are refunds paid to Cohen for a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels (pictured in a court sketch during her testimony on May 7, 2024) in exchange for not making public her claim about a 2006 incident. sexual encounter with Trump

At the center of the charges are refunds paid to Cohen for a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels (pictured in a court sketch during her testimony on May 7, 2024) in exchange for not making public her claim about a 2006 incident. sexual encounter with Trump

The National Enquirer’s parent company, American Media Inc., ultimately paid McDougal $150,000 for the rights to her story in a deal that also included writing and other opportunities with its fitness magazine and other publications.

The fourth element jurors requested is Pecker’s testimony about his October 2016 decision to back out of a deal to sell the rights to McDougal’s story to Trump through a company Cohen had set up for the transaction, known as “cession of rights”.

“I called Michael Cohen and told him that the agreement, the assignment agreement, was off. I’m not going to move forward. It’s a bad idea and I want you to break the agreement,” Pecker testified. “I was very, very angry. Very annoying. Basically yelling at me.’

Pecker testified that he reiterated to Cohen that he was not going to move forward with the deal.

He said Cohen told him, ‘The boss is going to be very angry with you.’

You may also like