An Ohio woman claims her Stanley Mug saved her life after a stray bullet went through the walls of her home and ricocheted off the popular glass.
Rachel, 22, examined the damage the stray bullet caused to the home she shares with her fiancé in a TikTok on February 12.
“Point of view: My Stanley Cup saves my life when there is a shooting in front of my house,” the Steubenville woman wrote.
Rachel then moved the camera past a gaping hole in the wall to a chipped perfume bottle before stopping on the glass, which had a bruise but was otherwise unscathed.
The eight-second clip has racked up more than 3.4 million views.
Rachel, 22, claims her Stanley Cup saved her life in a viral TikTok that has racked up more than 3.4 million views.
The brand’s popularity has skyrocketed thanks to a TikTok trend that saw young women and children flocking to buy the glass.
The 22-year-old posted a clip showing a hole in the wall of her home before panning towards a slightly bruised but unharmed glass.
In a follow-up video, which exceeded 463,000 views, the young woman showed a hole in the side of the house and a bullet fragment on the floor of her kitchen.
Rachel and her fiancé were talking before ‘“I heard about seven or eight gunshots,” followed by a “really loud bang” as the bullet went through his house.
The viral clip was reminiscent of another video that skyrocketed the popularity of Stanley Cups.
Another TikTok posted in November shows a dryer that supposedly survived a car fire.
In the video, Danielle Marie Lettering lifted the 40-ounce bottle from her badly charred vehicle and shook it to show that the ice in her drink had not melted.
He caught the attention of company president Terrance Riley, who not only promised to send him mugs, but also offered to pay for a new car.
Lettering has since called herself the “Stanley Cup Car Firefighter Girl.”
The durability of Quencher glasses has been documented in other viral clips, including one showing a Stanley mug that supposedly survived a car fire.
The clip, posted by Danielle Marie Lettering in November, pans through the remains of her car to reveal a seemingly unscathed Stanley glass in the cupholder. She shakes the bottle to show that the ice hasn’t melted.
However, the super popular brand has been receiving more negative publicity than support lately.
Several California and Nevada consumers have filed class action lawsuits against the Seattle-based parent company, Pacific Market International, LLC. over revelations that the glasses contain lead.
At high levels, the metal can cause irreversible damage. damage to the nervous system.
It poses a significant risk to young children, lending itself to developmental delays, learning disabilities, and other problems.
Lead poisoning, which occurs when the heavy metal builds up in the body, can be fatal.
Four California whistleblowers said the company falsely advertised its cups as “BPA-free” but failed to warn the public that lead is a “key ingredient” in its vacuum seal.
They claim they bought Stanley glasses before the company’s announcement in January and insist they would not have bought them if they had known they contained lead.
The lawsuit, filed Feb. 1, seeks $70 million in damages.
Stanley’s parent company, Pacific Market International, LLC. has been hit by several class action lawsuits alleging that the company failed to disclose the presence of lead in the glasses.
A second lawsuit filed by a Nevada woman on Feb. 12 claims she purchased a Stanley Mug for $35 from Target in March 2023 and accuses Pacific Market International of violating its warranty.
“Millions of consumers who purchased a Stanley glass in recent years were just informed last month that the glass designed for their use contains lead, a toxic substance that can cause serious health problems,” the lawsuit reads.
“They have become a viral sensation on social media, and the rise in popularity has been particularly sharp among young women.”
It notes the particular risk that lead poses to children and pregnant women, defining them as “part of the market targeted for the purchase of these products.”
A third lawsuit filed by a California woman on February 14 accuses the company of fraud by omission and negligent misrepresentation.
“PMI knew that Plaintiff and the Class could not reasonably be expected to know or discover that Stanley Glasses were misrepresented in the packaging, labels, advertising, and website prior to purchasing them,” the lawsuit reads.
The brand’s support page mentions that the material used to seal the vacuum insulation at the base of Stanley products “includes some lead.”
“Once sealed, this area is covered with a durable layer of stainless steel, making it inaccessible to consumers,” he continues.
“Rest assured, there is no lead present on the surface of any Stanley product that comes into contact with the consumer or in the contents of the product.”
