Meghan Markle’s public relations moves have become a frequent topic of discussion, with many questioning the direction they are headed. American correspondent Samuel Clench shared his opinion on the matter in a recent article for news.com.auexpressing skepticism about the Sussexes’ continued attempts to maintain a presence in Hollywood’s elite.
Clench criticized the couple’s lifestyle, describing it as “collaborating with the rich and famous, signing absurdly lucrative media deals, and enjoying the kind of lifestyle that most people would find too absurd to bother even dreaming of.” , while always presenting themselves as victims”.
He pointed out the glaring contradiction between his pursuit of fame and his previously stated desire for privacy, adding that “these are all clear, cold, unambiguous public relations coups.” Reflecting on his 2024 actions, Clench noted that his attempts to connect with the public have largely failed to resonate.
“The royal family – and there have been many maneuvers of this type, including the interview with Oprah – has made anyone who was not already predisposed to be understanding love them,” he said. Clench questioned the ultimate goal of the Sussexes’ efforts, suggesting: “I suppose it could just be about money, but that’s not the impression it gives.”
Clench also made comparisons between Meghan’s public relations efforts and the strategies used by political media teams. He suggested the Sussexes’ approach resembles that of a political team lacking a clear vision or cohesive message.
“The Sussex operation really brings to mind a political media outfit that has no real, coherent idea of what it is doing or what its message should be.” he explained. Despite the couple’s polished appearance and high-quality media production, Clench argued that the substance of their production leaves much to be desired.
“It’s polished. OMG, is it polished? Harry and Meghan use only the highest quality cameras. They have extremely competent producers. However, everything they produce is so banal. So empty. So empty and meaningless. It is all form without function; all optics without substance,” he concluded.
Clench’s critique highlights the ongoing debate over the Sussexes’ public image and their changing priorities as they navigate their post-royal lives.