It is difficult to think of a camera line that is more appealing to the enthusiasts and pro's than the X series from Fujifim, and especially the X-T models are big challenges.
Mixing the X-Trans CMOS sensor technology, the film simulation modes and a centrally located electronic viewfinder along with mass & # 39; s manual operation – and everything within a handsome, robust enclosure – would always be a winning formula, but things are going fast in two years and the new X-T3 delivers a wealth of improvements over the beloved, still coveted X-T2.
What follows is not a complete list of changes between the two, because we would have been here for a while. On the contrary, we examine the most important revisions between the two in the main areas.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T2: sensor
Fujifilm relied on 24MP sensors for its most recent models, many of which were based on the X-Trans CMOS architecture, and the X-T2 was one of the recipients. However, the X-T3 has the honor of being the first model with a fourth-generation version of the X-Trans technology.
The X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor still has the same APS-C dimensions as before, although its structure is quite different. It has an illuminated design – not something that we've seen on Samsung's APS-C camera since the Samsung NX1 left – to enable better light output than would otherwise be possible, and copper wiring has also been used to Boost display read speeds and further reduce noise.
It also increases the number of pixels to 26.1 MP, which is higher than any other camera in the X-series range, and now also has a lower base sensitivity of ISO160 (instead the ISO200 of the X-T2). 2.16 million of these pixels are now also loaded with phase detection AF tasks, which we will investigate in a second.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T2: processor
While the X-T2 offered the same X-Processor Pro engine with a star in the X-Pro2 – and more recently the flagship X-H1 and medium-format GFX 50S (bottom) models – the X-T3 introduces a fresh engine for the X series.
X-Processor 4 is equipped with a Quad Core CPU, which increases the processing speeds up to three times compared to the previous engine. In addition, it provides faster autofocus and better accuracy, along with new video options and changes in the Film Simulation modes. It also allows the user to apply the Color Chrome Effect mode, previously only seen on the GFX 50S, to both individual images and bursts.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T2: autofocus
Apart from the new sensor and processor of the X-T3, it is the autofocus system that has demonstrably seen the biggest changes compared to the X-T2. In fact, it is partial because of the new sensor and processor that the autofocus system jumps just as forward as it does.
To begin with, the X-T3 sensor has more than four times as many phase detection AF pixels as the 500,000 on the sensor of the X-T2, with a number of 2.16 million. These extend over almost the entire frame, so that the system can observe subjects virtually anywhere.
This density is also said to help the new camera achieve a lower working range of -3EV (against the 1EV rating of the X-T2 after a firmware update), and it should also help in tracking of moving subjects.
The processor is also behind an increase of 50% of the autofocus and measuring frequency, so that the camera can lock the focus more accurately and get the exposure, even against moving subjects. Face and eye detection are also improved, with the latter working when the camera is set to AF-C to hold a lock wherever the subjects are located.
With the X-T2 you can manually address 325 points, while the X-T3 adds a hundred to make 425. That is a lot of switching, but you can scale this to 91 and 117 if you think this is too much of a good thing.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T2: burst recording speed
The X-T2 has a very respectable 8 fps burst recording option, which can be increased to 11 fps when using the optional Vertical Booster Grip. Switch to the electronic shutter and the Boost mode and you can fire with 14 fps without additional accessories.
This is undoubtedly more than adequate for most applications, but the X-T3 once again overcomes its predecessor. A standard 11 fps burst recording option gives it a 3fps advantage with the mechanical shutter, and this can be increased to 20 fps when the electronic shutter is used. You can also use the X-T3 with its own Vertical Grip (below), although this does not increase the burst speed as the X-T2's do.
The X-T3 has another trick, namely the Sports Finder mode. This uses a 1.25x cutout to speed things up to a maximum of 30 fps. The only caveat here is that images are executed with 16.6 MP instead of 26.1 MP, although this will undoubtedly be sufficient for most applications.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs. X-T2: EVF
The electronic viewfinder of the X-T2 has the familiar 2.36 million dots spread over an OLED panel and has a magnification of 0.77x. This is perfectly respectable for a mirrorless model of the caliber of the X-T2, but the X-T3 is being launched at a time when things have emerged from it.
Like the Panasonic GH5S, Canon EOS R and Nikon Z7, the X-T3 has a 3.69 million dot panel in its viewfinder. At 0.75x the magnification is actually a bit lower than before, but not so much.
The finder offers the same refresh rate of 100 fps as the panel in the X-T2, but only if the camera is used in Boost mode; otherwise, the refresh rate is 60 fps. Display delay time is also unchanged between the two, at a super fast 0.005sec.
Incidentally, this is not the first time we have seen a 3.69 million point finder on a Fujifilm camera. The GFX 50S also benefits from an EVF with the same resolution and a slightly higher magnification of 0.82x, but this is a removable viewfinder instead of one processed in the camera itself.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T2: size and weight
The specification sheet of the X-T3 shows that it is a bit heavier than the X-T2, weighing 539 g with its battery and card in place. That said, this is not perceptible and so it makes no difference in the hand. This is possibly explained by the fact that the X-T3 is almost 1 cm deeper and 1 mm larger than the X-T2.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs. X-T2: video functions
The X-T2 was already able to capture UHD 4K video when it was released, and thanks to a firmware update, it gained access to the F-Log recording profile and high-speed video up to 120 fps with 1080p output. So even if Fujifilm did not change too much here, the X-T3 would probably remain a tempting option for videographers.
And yet it did. The X-T3 can record UHD 4K and DCI 4K recordings up to 60p, on 10-bit with 4: 2: 0 chroma sub-sampling internally, and can output the same resolution and frame rate (although with 4: 2: 2) sampling) via the micro HDMI port. The X-T2 now manages 4K / 30p recording on 8 bit with 4: 2: 0 part sampling internally, and 4: 2: 2 8 bit output via the HDMI port.
The X-T3 user can now also choose between H.264 / MPEG-4 and H.265 / HVEC codecs, and roller shutter would be reduced to 17ms, while the ETERNA / Cinema Film Simulation mode is also an option for the new arrival. A firmware update later this year is also set to support the camera Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG).
While the X-T3 uses a small 1.18x crop when recording 4K images with 60p, this disappears at 30p (which had a crop gain of 1.17x on the X-T2). A new 4K interframe NR noise reduction function would help reduce noise with ISO 12,800 with two stops on the X-T3.
This wealth of changes is impressive. Of course, now that we have seen so much of a shift between the two cameras, it is possible that a part of what can be gifted to the X-T2 ends up on that camera via a firmware update.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T2: color options
The X-T2 has 15 film simulation settings, including the different filter options that can be applied to images recorded in the monochrome and acro styles. The new X-T3 reflects this, but also adds the video-focused ETERNA / Cinema option we saw for the first time in the X-H1.
Two further changes split the newer X-T3 of the X-T2. First, the Chrome effect of Chrome that we saw for the first time in the GFX 50S also made the transition to the newer model. This option is intended to clarify details in highly saturated subjects, such as flowers with only one dominant shade, that are difficult to display, and you can set this to Weak or Strong settings.
The second change on the X-T3 involves toning effects when recording black and white images. When the camera is set to the Monochrome or ACROS options, you can access a slider that lets you inject a cooler or warmer cast (below) into images. You can move each path in small steps to give images a more subtle tone or a little more pronounced.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T2: ports
Fujifilm has made some minor changes to the ports and connectivity options of the X-T3 of the X-T2 and, depending on how you work, you will notice that some of them are significant.
Instead of the micro USB 3.0 port of the X-T2, for example, the X-T2 has a USB 3.1 Type C port, although both cameras have the same micro (Type D) HDMI port.
The presence of both 3.5 mm microphone and headphone ports on the X-T3 is a welcome change for videographers because the previous X-T2 has no headphone port. The only way to do this is to use the port on the Vertical Booster Grip, but not everyone will only buy it for this purpose.
The door to these ports on the X-T3 can also be removed, something that was not possible on the X-T2. This allows a number of cables to be used simultaneously without the door being in the way.
Fujifilm X-T3 vs. X-T2: performance of the battery
Despite the use of the same NP-W126S battery, it seems that the newer processor can squeeze a little extra juice for the newer camera.
While the X-T2 can manage 340 frames on one charge, the X-T3 promises to make it 390. Video instead? Times do not differ too much here, with each model having a five-minute lead or being disadvantageous to the others, depending on whether you capture in 4K or Full HD and whether you have enabled Face Detection.
If you are concerned about battery life, you can pack an extra battery or use either model with a special handle, with a total of 1,000 and 1,100 frames on the X-T2 and X-T3.