WhatsNew2Day
Latest News And Breaking Headlines

What does each paragraph of the statement by Harry and Meghan really mean?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex published an extraordinary statement on their website after they had to drop their ‘Sussex Royal’ brand last night.

In the sour-sounding statement, Meghan and Harry claimed that the queen has no “jurisdiction” over the lucrative term “royal” abroad.

They also seemed to complain that the palace treats them differently from other family members.

Here MailOnline decodes what each carefully chosen sentence means.

There is “no jurisdiction of The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word” Royal “abroad”:

Harry and Meghan make it perfectly clear that they can use the term “Royal” as part of their overseas surf if they wish

Harry and Meghan make it perfectly clear that they can use the term “Royal” as part of their overseas surf if they wish.

After their transition this spring, they will, however, drop the period at the request of the queen.

The Daily Mail reported for the first time that the queen had asked Harry and Meghan not to use the name ‘Sussex Royal’ when they no longer work royals.

It’s a big blow to the couple that has spent tens of thousands of pounds building the Sussex Royal brand website and creating a hugely popular Instagram feed.

In an unprecedented legal movement, the Queen has established lawyers at the top in an attempt to enforce the ban.

A series of trademark applications, from items of clothing and books to stationery and bandanas, were withdrawn.

It comes after MailOnline revealed yesterday that Meghan has told friends that there is nothing that ‘legally blocks’ her and Harry from using their Sussex Royal name.

Meghan complained to her inner circle that the use of the name “shouldn’t be a problem in the first place and that they don’t want to sell T-shirts and pencils,” the insider said.

They added, “Meghan said she’s done with the drama and has no room in her life for no-sayers, and the same goes for Harry.”

The friend added: “Meghan said the global projects they are working on speak for themselves and they chose that name to protect the royal name, not to benefit.”

But the insider added: ‘Meghan has told her inner circle that their success is inevitable with or without their current brand name.

“She said, regardless of the name, Harry and Archie have royal blood and nobody can take that away. And that they are always regarded as royalty as a family. “

“There is a precedent for other members of the Royal Family to look for work outside the institution”:

Harry and Meghan imply that they are treated differently from other members of the royal family who “can look for work outside the institution”

Harry and Meghan imply that they are treated differently from other members of the royal family who “can look for work outside the institution.”

They say the guidelines are different for them, a 12-month evaluation period has been set.

However, they insist that it is their “preference” to continue to represent and support Her Majesty the Queen, albeit in a more limited capacity, without using the Sovereign Grant.

The couple insists that it is their “preference” to continue to represent and support Her Majesty the Queen, albeit in a more limited capacity, without using the Sovereign Grant.

“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to need effective security to protect them and their son”:

The couple also insisted that security “to protect them and their son” is necessary amid controversies surrounding protection costs

The couple also insisted that security “to protect them and their son” is necessary amid controversies surrounding protection costs.

It is estimated that the protection of Meghan and Harry in Canada and the UK costs between £ 3 million and £ 6 million per year, as staff work around the clock around two weeks in a row.

The statement said: “It has been agreed that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will continue to require effective security to protect them and their son.

‘This is based on the Duke’s public profile based on his birth in the royal family, his military service, the Duchess’s own independent profile and the shared threat and risk level that has been specifically documented in recent years.

“No further details can be shared, because this is confidential information for security reasons.”

The couple boldly insists that security is necessary, so that the no-sayers stop quickly and suddenly.

However, they refuse to give details about what forms this protection will take, and claim that this would be a breach of ‘security’.

By saying that no more details can ‘be’ shared, the couple implies that they want to give more information but cannot.

“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex become privately funded members of the royal family with permission to earn their own income and the ability to pursue their own private interests”:

Staying financially independent is an important concern of Megxit.

The couple plans to relaunch their careers – possibly millions of pounds a year – in an effort to become “financially independent.”

This allows them to give up the financing of the Sovereign Grant – the taxpayers who give to the queen every year – and launch themselves on the international celebrity circuit.

Earlier this year, they said they had “made the choice” to “stop receiving funding” from the Sovereign Grant, and added, “Their Royal Highnesses would rather release this financial bond.”

Harry and Meghan’s first appearance after Megxit earlier this month was at an American banking giant JP Morgan event in Miami – an organization involved in a series of controversies.

Harry is still ‘sixth in line with the throne’:

The line of succession to the monarchy is: Prince of Wales followed by Prince William, then Prince George, Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis finally followed by Prince Harry

The line of succession to the monarchy is: Prince of Wales followed by Prince William, then Prince George, Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis finally followed by Prince Harry

The line of succession to the monarchy is: Prince of Wales followed by Prince William, then Prince George, Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis finally followed by Prince Harry

The statement indicates that Harry is still sixth in line with the throne.

The line of succession to the monarchy is: Prince of Wales followed by Prince William, then Prince George, Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis finally followed by Prince Harry.

The statement reads: “As the grandson of Her Majesty and second son of Prince Prince of Wales, Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex remains sixth in line with the throne of The British Monarchy and the Order of Precedence is unchanged.”

They will “be allowed to keep their patronages”:

The statement states that the couple may retain their patronage even though they may not perform “official duties” for the queen

The statement states that the couple may retain their patronage, even though they may not perform “official duties” for the queen.

By using the word ‘allowed’, they place the responsibility on the queen, who has made it clear to the couple that she has given her explicit permission.

It comes after Meghan was given until Easter to prove her courage as Royal Patron of the National Theater, according to a top producer from the West End.

She received the honor in January of last year from the queen, who had been the patron saint of the National for 45 years.

Nica Burns – who is co-owner of the Nimax Group, which consists of six London West End theaters, including The Palace, Apollo and Vaudeville – has said that the Duchess should not retain this function indefinitely.

Mrs. Burns said, “I think we should give Meghan until Easter to say what she thinks is possible with her patronage.”

‘We have to give her a chance, forget who she is and give her some space.

“If she isn’t going to do work with the National, she has to resign. But because she is a role model, we prefer that she did not. “

The duke’s and duchess’s statement read as follows: “It was agreed that the duke and duchess could no longer formally perform” official duties “for the queen or represent the Commonwealth, but they would be allowed to keep their patrons (including those classified) as ‘royal’ patrons). “

Harry ‘retains the rank of Major, and honorary privileges of Lieutenant Commander and Squadron Leader’

The statement makes it clear that Harry will maintain military titles, including: the rank of Major, and honorary interests of Lieutenant Commander and Squadron Leader.

It was previously revealed that Harry is being stripped of a number of military positions, including Captain General of the Royal Marines, the ceremonial head of the corps.

He also loses Honorary Air Commander of Royal Air Force Base Honington and Honorary Commodore in Chief of Small Ships and Diving, Royal Naval Command.

Harry will also be excluded from wearing his military uniform after resigning from the armed forces, although he can still wear his medals on engagements.

The couple’s explanation was: “Regarding the army, the Duke of Sussex retains the rank of major and the honorary duties of lieutenant commander and squadron leader.

“During this 12-month period, the Duke’s official military appointments will not be used because they are in the possession of the Sovereign. No new agreements are made to fulfill these roles before the 12-month evaluation of the new arrangements is completed.

“According to the agreement, the duke will not perform official duties related to these roles, given his dedication to the military community and ten years of service he will naturally continue his unwavering support to the military community in an unofficial capacity.

“As the founder of the Invictus Games, The Duke will proudly continue to support the military community around the world through the Invictus Games Foundation and The Endeavor Fund.”

The statement of Harry and Meghan on their website in full

AS AGREED AND IMPLEMENTED IN JANUARY 2020:

  • It has been agreed that the beginning of the revised role of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take effect in the spring of 2020 and will undergo a 12-month review.
  • The royal family respects and understands the desire of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to lead a more independent family life by removing the alleged justification of “public interest” for media intrusion into their lives. They remain a valued part of Her Majesty’s family.
  • The Duke and Duchess of Sussex become privately funded members of the royal family with permission to earn their own income and the ability to pursue their own private interests.
  • The preference of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex was to continue to represent and support Her Majesty The Queen, albeit in a more limited capacity, without using the Sovereign Grant.
  • Although there is a precedent for other members of the royal family to look for work outside the institution, an evaluation period of 12 months has been set for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
  • Under the agreement, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex understand that they are obliged to give up royal duties and not to perform representative duties on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen.
  • As agreed and recorded in January, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex retain their “HRH” prefix, keeping them formally known as His Royal Highness The Duke of Sussex and Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will no longer actively use their HRH titles, since they will no longer work in the family from the spring of 2020.
  • As the grandson of Her Majesty and second son of The Prince of Wales, Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex remains sixth in line with the throne of The British Monarchy and the Order of Precedence is unchanged.
  • It was agreed that the duke and duchess would no longer be able to perform “official duties” for The Queen or represent the Commonwealth, but they would be allowed to keep their patronages (including those classified as “royal”). patrons).
  • It has been agreed that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will continue to require effective security to protect them and their son. This is based on the Duke’s public profile based on his birth in the royal family, his military service, the Duchess’s own independent profile, and the shared threat and risk level that has been specifically documented in recent years. No further details can be shared, as this is confidential information for security reasons.
  • Regarding the army, the Duke of Sussex will retain the rank of major and honorary rank of lieutenant commander and squadron leader. During this 12-month period, the Duke’s official military appointments will not be used because they are in the possession of the Sovereign. No new agreements are made to fulfill these roles before the 12-month evaluation of the new arrangements is completed.
  • Although according to the agreement, the duke will not perform official duties related to these roles, given his dedication to the military community and ten years of service he will of course continue his unwavering support to the military community in an unofficial capacity. As the founder of the Invictus Games, The Duke will proudly continue to support the military community around the world through the Invictus Games Foundation and The Endeavor Fund.
  • Based on the desire of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to have a limited role as members of the royal family, it was decided in January that their institutional office should be closed, given the primary funding mechanism for this official office in Buckingham HRH Palace The Prince of Wales. The Duke and Duchess shared this news with their team in January as soon as they knew the decision and worked closely with their staff to ensure a smooth transition for each of them.
  • For the past month and a half, the duke and duchess have remained actively involved in this process, which has been understandably sad for the duke and duchess and their loyal staff, given the proximity of their Royal Highnesses and their dedicated team.
  • As the duke and duchess are no longer considered to be full-time members of the royal family, it was agreed that the use of the word “Royal” should be reviewed as it relates to organizations associated with them in this new context. More details about this below.

ADDITIONAL DETAILS:

  • As shared on this website at the beginning of January, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are not about to start a “foundation,” but rather about developing a new way to bring about change and the efforts of so many excellent foundations worldwide. to fill.
  • The creation of this non-profit entity will, in addition to their cause-driven work, for which they are still deeply committed. Although the duke and duchess are focused on plans to set up a new non-profit organization, given the specific UK government rules on the use of the word ‘Royal’, it has been agreed that their non-profit organization will not be named use ‘Sussex Royal’ or another version of ‘Royal’.
  • For the above reason, the trademark applications filed as protective measures and reflecting the same standard trademark applications as made for The Royal Foundation or The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been deleted.
  • Although there is no jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word “Royal” abroad, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to put “Sussex Royal” or any repetition of the word “Royal” on any territory (either in the UK or otherwise) when the transition takes place in the spring of 2020.
  • While the Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to develop their non-profit organization and make plans for their future, we hope that you will use this site as a source for factual information. In the spring of 2020 their digital channels will be renewed while they present you the next exciting phase.

.