Take a fresh look at your lifestyle.

Using filters in your selfies results in LESS on Instagram, says a study

The use of filters in their selfies will not increase the amount of likes they get on Instagram, but showing their work or hobby in the image could give them a boost.

Researchers at Rowan University in New Jersey examined a series of publicly published selfies on the social media platform owned by Facebook.

They discovered that the use of photo filters in selfies actually generated less likes from other users compared to unfiltered images.

For a better chance of getting likes in an image, they suggest it is personal when revealing their work, hobbies or economic status in the image.

One study finds that the use of filters in their Instagram photos 'makes no difference' in terms of how much I like it, but showing your work or hobby on the image could give you a boost. Stock Image

One study finds that the use of filters in their Instagram photos ‘makes no difference’ in terms of how much I like it, but showing your work or hobby on the image could give you a boost. Stock Image

The author of the article, Dr. Seoyeon Hong, said that the excessive use of filters and the desire to present only its positive side discourages people from clicking Like or participating in general.

“The number of likes was lower for selfies posted with filters, such as stickers or excessive use of color filters compared to selfies without those filters,” he said.

“Studies in personal presentations suggest that excessive and excessive intention towards others to think only positively about an individual’s self-image can trigger reluctance to participate.”

According to the results of the study, the use of techniques to improve the way the image makes you see is ‘naive’ by other users on Instagram.

“It reflects the intention to present only the ideal representation of oneself,” said Dr. Hong.

This is the first study that examines the number of likes in a given selfie to evaluate how other users perceive the type of image and its content.

The researchers looked at 1,873 selfies as part of the study and analyzed which ones got the most reaction and if there were any patterns in the successful photos.

“By investigating what influences the evaluation of selfies, this study undoubtedly facilitates a deeper understanding of the behavior of selfies among social media users,” Dr. Hong said in the newspaper.

“Our results suggest that selfie users and social media users should be cautious when posting selfies, as it could not work as intended.”

According to the Social Information Processing Theory, additional information suggests a 'willingness to relate to others', which generates positive impressions.

According to the Social Information Processing Theory, additional information suggests a 'willingness to relate to others', which generates positive impressions.

According to the Social Information Processing Theory, additional information suggests a ‘willingness to relate to others’, which generates positive impressions.

The research team discovered that the most successful images in terms of “ likes ” obtained were those that had social cues within the image, such as work, hobby or relationship.

“When the selfies included social cues from the person taking selfies, I had more likes compared to the selfies without any social cues from the individuals,” said Dr. Hong.

“The results indicate that selfies that provide additional information about people in the form of social cues, such as professional identity or wealth status, can be perceived as an additional intention to interact with other users of social networks.”

According to the Social Information Processing Theory, additional information suggests a ‘willingness to relate to others’, which generates positive impressions.

The team found that, by comparison, just uploading a picture of their face or body with a filter or sticker was more passive and did not suggest a desire to interact.

“While selfies are, by definition, a visual representation of the individual, we suggest that other personal information can be provided,” said Dr. Hong.

The research team discovered that the most successful images in terms of likes obtained were those that had social cues within the image, such as work, hobby or relationship.

The research team discovered that the most successful images in terms of likes obtained were those that had social cues within the image, such as work, hobby or relationship.

The research team discovered that the most successful images in terms of likes obtained were those that had social cues within the image, such as work, hobby or relationship.

This additional information shown within an image includes luxury products, physical fitness or professional identity, such as a uniform or work environment.

For the study, the team searched the word ‘selfie’ on Instagram and found more than 2,000 images of mostly faces.

They took a random sample of public publications of those results and stored them as screenshots, including the amount of likes; then they filtered any that was promotional or not from a face.

Almost everyone in the sample set was women. Due to the fact that they used a simple search to gather faces, it was not selective and, therefore, 90 percent were women.

About half were Caucasians followed by 25 percent Hispanic, 18.8 percent Asian and 4.6 percent African American, they said in the newspaper.

The research has been published in the magazine. Computers in human behavior.

Instagram: the application of one billion dollars. How two Stanford graduates started the photo sharing platform and sold it for a fortune just two years later

Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger met when they were students at Stanford University, in the heart of Silicon Valley, San Francisco, California.

Systrom and Krieger worked separately in Silicon Valley, before founding Instagram in 2010.

After a brief trial period, the couple officially launched the application in October of that year, and in December, Instagram had a million users.

The following year, the application won several compliments and users downloaded Instagram en masse.

Instagram co-founders Kevin Systrom, pictured, and Mike Krieger launched Instagram in 2010 after meeting at the university.

Instagram co-founders Kevin Systrom, pictured, and Mike Krieger launched Instagram in 2010 after meeting at the university.

Instagram co-founders Kevin Systrom, pictured, and Mike Krieger launched Instagram in 2010 after meeting at the university.

Facebook bought Instagram in 2012, just before going public, at a price that seemed inconceivable at that time, $ 1 billion, especially for a little-known startup with no profits.

At that time, Instagram had no ads, with a faithful follow-up of 31 million users who were all on mobile devices, still a somewhat elusive group for Facebook born on the web at the time.

Since then, the service has grown to more than one billion users and, of course, has added many ads.

It became the fourth Facebook platform to eclipse the brand of one billion users, including the homonymous social network with more than two billion users, and the WhatsApp and Messenger messaging applications.

The latest product of the application, IGTV, has been slow to gain traction. Offered through Instagram and as a standalone application, IGTV offers longer-lasting video content, mainly from popular Instagram users.

Video content has been an important emphasis for Facebook, as it seeks to satisfy advertisers’ desire to stream more commercials online.

.