RIATH AL-SAMARRAI: From star man to forgotten man, Raheem Sterling’s England exile is no longer a surprise. Here’s why we WON’T see him at the Euros

It’s funny and sad the cycles we have in sports. The new becomes old and the old is forgotten very quickly, isn’t it? I was thinking about that a bit the other day, because at the very moment Gareth Southgate left Raheem Sterling out of another England team, something else was happening 4,000 miles away in Florida.

The players’ championship was being held here, but on Thursday the eyes of many in the gallery suddenly shifted from the golfers to the burly guy to my left.

For the life of me, I had no idea who he could be, but I soon learned his name is Caleb Williams and it turns out this is a good time to be Caleb Williams – he’s a quarterback who’s probably going to be number one. pick in the NFL draft next month. As you can imagine, that must be one of the best parts of the sports cycle. Everything is rosy. Everything is possible. Everyone loves you. Everyone wants to say your name.

So I tagged along with him for a few holes and he made a comment to my buddy, Daniel Matthews, that really made me laugh. They asked him how he handles all that commotion and he replied: “I smile and wave, like the penguins in Madagascar.”

And he smiled and waved, all while on a mission to watch Jordan Spieth. That’s an interesting guy for the cycle conversation: Spieth was once the next Tiger Woods and hasn’t won a major since his third seven years ago. He missed the cut a day later. The other golfer Williams was interested in, Rory McIlroy, tried and failed to win a fifth for 10 years and Williams thought his name was Roy.

Your browser does not support iframes.

Again, cycles. You may never know you’ve hit the downward curve until your fans shift their gaze to a guy who thinks your name is Roy.

But that is McIlroy’s struggle and it will always seem momentary. As if he could recover in the blink of an eye. With Sterling everything seems very different. At this point, Sterling’s omissions from Southgate’s meetings are no surprise. We can count six of them in a row since the World Cup, but they hardly count as news anymore.

Is Kalvin Phillips being eliminated? That stood out more and the guy has barely played for two years. Does Ben White reject the call? That was a big problem.

But Sterling? That was a murmur. A point that must be buried far below other events and that serves to ask some questions to Southgate and Mauricio Pochettino. But old news is no longer news. And Sterling is old news for Southgate. It’s old news that he’s old news.

If we buy that line from Oscar Wilde, the one where the only thing worse than talking is not talking, then that is the stage of the cycle where we find sterling.

But we won’t find him at the European Championships this summer, barring a change of fortune that seems wildly out of character with his career. No. This is the Phil Foden cycle. By Bukayo Saka. By Cole Palmer. You have to go through Jarrod Bowen and Anthony Gordon to get to a man who, three years ago, was England’s best player when he reached the final of the same tournament.

Has a cycle moved so quickly in the wrong direction for any English footballer in his prime in recent history? Have any of them transformed from rainmaker to cloud so markedly without serious injury? I can’t think of one.

And that’s sad. It’s a nuanced sympathy, but it’s sad.

It was once the future, we know, but what is its sporting future like now? He is 29 years old and his season has been quite good: he has six goals and six assists for that Chelsea team in the Premier League. And maybe he’ll add to that today in the FA Cup against Leicester. Perhaps he has one of those afternoon flourishes that shows us, and Southgate, what all the fuss is about.

Except there’s not much fuss and flourishes are rare: he had a strong November, a flat December, excellent against Middlesbrough in January, terrible against Wolves in February. Decisive against Manchester City, desperate against Liverpool, a failed one-on-one against Newcastle.

Your line goes up, your line goes down, and the discussion about your place in the ecosystem becomes increasingly quiet. Not an unbridled silence, but a silence of long-standing inertia. The silence you feel when a talent that was once so brilliant is no longer worth bragging about. Cursed by those whose form is much better than good enough; condemned by a creeping sound of silence.

Hopefully it can turn the situation around and that is a fading hope rooted in memories of how destructive it was until relatively recently. Maybe it was never as close to greatness as we thought, but you don’t start more than 30 league games in six consecutive seasons in a Pep Guardiola attack unless he thinks you’re pretty good. You don’t score 131 goals for Manchester City and winners for England in three of six games en route to a final unless you’re really good.

Much of it may have been frozen in the Stamford Bridge morgue when he joined in 2022. I also see merit in the view of those much closer to the England camp that Southgate’s confidence in Sterling, beyond his contributions as a player, was compromised during the World Cup that same year, his last step on such a stage.

Some details of that trip remain a bit hazy two years later: Was he willing to accept being a player on the team? Could he have returned to Qatar more quickly after a robbery at his home, the details of which prompted differing accounts from his spokeswoman and the police?

If there’s a lesson, maybe it’s that the great and good should smile and wave when they get the chance because you never really know when a quarterback might ask: What happened to Roy Sterling?

Manchester United rewards failure

Richard Arnold received a £5.5m severance pay when he resigned as Manchester United chief executive. Of course he did. Why bother succeeding when failure is so fabulously lucrative?

Why are the Russians in the Olympic Games?

I wrote in this space a few weeks ago about Kamila Valieva, the Russian figure skater who was 15 when she found herself at the center of a doping storm at the 2022 Winter Olympics.

This week the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which suspended her for four years, revealed that she had been on a regimen of 56 medications, nutritional and dietary supplements.

None were on the banned list, but all raised questions about who, why and how.

Who put all those things in a child? Why has only the athlete been sanctioned? And how on earth are Russian athletes still allowed anywhere near the Paris Olympics?