Home Tech Paul McCartney says that the change of law on AI could ‘scam’ to artists

Paul McCartney says that the change of law on AI could ‘scam’ to artists

0 comments
Paul McCartney says that the change of law on AI could 'scam' to artists

Sir Paul McCartney warned that artificial intelligence could “scam” artists if a proposed review of the copyright continues.

The proposals could eliminate the incentive for writers and artists and give rise to a “loss of creativity,” he told the BBC.

The use of copyright material to help training AI models is the object of a recently launched government consultation.

McCartney, one of the two surviving members of the Beatles, said: “You get young, girls, who come, and write a beautiful song, and do not possess it, and they have nothing to do with him. And anyone who wants to cheat him” .

“The truth is that money is going somewhere … someone pays someone, so why shouldn’t it be the guy who sat and wrote yesterday?”

The lack of clarity about whether it is correct and fair to use copyright material to train models that are feeding the last wave of artificial intelligence tools have led to debate throughout the world, with legal cases launched by companies and Individuals in creative industries about what they argue is the useless use of their material.

In contrast, some editorial organizations and the media have signed license agreements with AI companies to allow them to use their material to train these models.

It is not the first time that McCartney has generated fears about the threat that AI could represent for the arts. In December, he warned AI “simply take care” and joined actors Julianne Moore, Stephen Fry and Hugh Bonneville in the signing of a requestwhich establishes that the “useless use of creative works to train the generative AI is an important and unfair threat to the livelihoods of people behind those works, and should not be allowed.”

The novelist Kate Mosse has supported a parallel campaign for the amendments to the data invoice that would allow the application of the existing copyright law of the United Kingdom, which means that creators could negotiate a payment just when licensed by their material.

The government said it would use the consultation, which extends until February 25, to explore the key points of the debate, including how to improve trust between creative sectors and AI, and how creators can license and be paid for The use of your material.

McCartney appealed to the government to rethink the plans. “We are the people, you are the government. You are supposed to protect us. That is your job, ”he said.

“So, if you are making an invoice, be sure to protect creative thinkers, creative artists or you will not have them.”

In November 2023, McCartney and Sir Ringo Starr created the song from time to time using AI technology to separate John Lennon’s voice from a house demonstration recorded in 1977.

The Secretary of Culture, Lisa Nandy, said last year: “This government firmly believes that our musicians, writers, artists and other creatives should have the ability to know and control how their content is used by AI companies and be able to seek agreements of license and licenses and license agreements fair.

“Achieving this and guaranteeing legal certainty will help our creative sectors and to grow and innovate together in association.”

You may also like