Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interpretation of their 2017 engagement interview as “scripted” and “rehearsed” has been questioned by experts, including those directly involved in the event.
in your Netflix documentariesMeghan described the BBC interview as an “orchestrated reality show.” She elaborated on the experience, saying: “So we did it with the press, then we went in, took off our coat and did the interview, so it was all right then and there. But then I also like, ‘and then there will be a moment where they will ask to see the ring.’ What I mean is that we weren’t allowed to tell our story because they didn’t want to…”
Prince Harry echoed her sentiments, adding: “Well, we’ve never been allowed to tell our story… That’s consistency.” However, Mishal Husain, the BBC journalist who conducted the engagement interview, responded to the allegations with a scathing comment. “We know that memories can vary on this particular issue,” Husain said, casting doubt on the couple’s relationship. claims.
Lord Hall, who was director general of the BBC at the time of the interview, went further and flatly dismissed Meghan’s allegations. He claimed his claims were “simply false,” defending the integrity of the original broadcast.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s comments have reignited discussions about their departure from royal life and their continued criticism of the institution. Critics argue that such statements undermine their credibility, while supporters maintain that the couple is shedding light on their lived experiences.
The conflicting accounts highlight the tensions between the Sussexes and the royal establishment, as well as their complicated relationship with the media. While Meghan and Harry continue to affirm their side of events, the pushback from those who participated in their 2017 engagement interview highlights the complexity of reconciling different perspectives on their journey.