As close as the polls are, it looks like Donald Trump will win.
After all, why else would the left-wing media call him Hitler?
Why else would MSNBC blatantly intercut footage of the 1939 Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden with Trump’s Sunday MSG event, packed with middle- and working-class voters (in effect, calling those voters Nazis)?
Why else would the New York Times cover the front page of its Sunday opinion section with huge letters, a font size otherwise reserved for the outbreak of world wars, about what Trump will do if he wins, including ‘ USING SOLDIERS AGAINST CITIZENS’? ?
Not to mention the furor over the refusal of both the LA Times and the Washington Post (owned by Amazon’s Jeff Bezos) to endorse either candidate, sending the left into a tizzy over canceled subscriptions and online virtue signaling social.
Author Stephen King: ‘After five years, I canceled my subscription to the Washington Post,’ a statement King posted on X, which happens to be owned by another Trump-supporting billionaire. The left cannot win by trying.
As close as the polls are, it looks like Donald Trump will win. After all, why else would the left-wing media call him Hitler? Why else would MSNBC blatantly intercut footage of the 1939 Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden with Trump’s Sunday MSG event (pictured)?
Yes, even the WaPo (its not-too-subtle motto ‘Democracy dies in darkness’, born after Trump’s victory in 2016) has perhaps rethought what is at stake.
What does it say when two of the biggest left-wing newspapers in America can’t, or won’t, endorse Kamala Harris over Trump? A man who we are told is an irredeemable, sexist, xenophobic racist who represents a threat like no other we have ever faced?
This is exactly what it says: billionaire businessmen know a loser when they see one.
This weekend, Harris was the subject of an extensive New York Times profile, reported by 100 friends and colleagues who also seemed unable to offer a full endorsement. In particular, they noted that “she was not a talented student” in law school, and that her 2019 presidential bid “revealed a person for whom…politics did not come naturally.” He struggled to define himself ideologically.
As he still does, a struggle that is unbearable to watch. But of course, this NYT article, ‘The World According to Kamala Harris,’ argued that as a woman of color, everything has been harder for Kamala Harris.
Excuse me? Let’s face it: Identity politics might be the only reason this unimpressive, unintellectual Word Salad Queen has risen far above her capabilities to potentially become President of the United States.
As Kamala would say: let’s understand how we got here.
During a 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden was forced to promise a running mate, and Harris, who had nearly called Biden a racist during her own failed campaign, was there, willing to forgive and forget, if not acknowledge that she would never I believed what he had said in the first place.
Jill Biden has reportedly never forgiven her. Does anyone really believe that she and Joe, still smarting from her forced ouster, want Harris to win?
The Bidens, the billionaire class, and rational voters around the world know that Trump is not going to unleash the military on American citizens, “be a dictator from day one,” or prosecute his political enemies.
Hell, Trump even said he would consider pardoning Hunter Biden if he were elected!
“I wouldn’t take it off the books,” Trump told radio host Hugh Hewitt last week. “Unlike Joe Biden, despite what they’ve done to me, despite what they’ve persecuted me with so much cruelty… I think it’s very bad for our country.”
Look at that. If only left-wing media would amplify that message. Instead, we had Michelle Obama defending Harris over the weekend, protesting to crowds the same way her husband has been unsuccessfully protesting to black male voters.
“I hope you’ll forgive me,” Michelle said in Kalamazoo, Michigan, on Saturday, “if I’m a little frustrated that some of us choose to ignore Donald Trump’s gross incompetence while asking Kamala to dazzle us at every turn.”
Dazzle us? At this point, we are just looking for a coherent and specific answer to any question. Just one.
But, Michelle tells it, voters worried about the border crisis, rising crime, a shortage of affordable housing and a burning Middle East just need to lower their expectations.
“We separated Kamala’s answers from interviews that (Trump) doesn’t even have the courage to do,” he continued.
Please. Trump sat down for three hours with Joe Rogan last week, an appearance that has already racked up more than 34 million views on YouTube alone. And this billionaire spoke the lingua franca of his working-class supporters: MMA fighters, what he learned about UFOs, and his absolute amazement at moving into the White House and being in Lincoln’s bedroom.
Trump also noted that, unlike Harris, he can speak discursively before returning to his initial thought: what he calls “the fabric.”
The vice president, he said, “couldn’t put two sentences together.”
That is a frank truth. It certainly lands better than the hysterical cries of fascism.
Michelle Obama defended Harris over the weekend, protesting to the crowd in the same way her husband has been unsuccessfully doing to black male voters.
Harris has an open invitation to do Rogan’s show, but he won’t do it because he can’t talk that for long, so extemporaneously, and everyone knows it.
He didn’t have the guts to show up at Al Smith’s benefit dinner earlier this month, as presidential candidates of all parties have historically done (except Walter Mondale in 1984). Even Trump and Hillary appeared together in 2016, and that was at the height of ‘lock her up!’
This year, comedian and host Jim Gaffigan spoke on behalf of the politicians and power brokers in that room.
‘Why isn’t Vice President Harris here? I mean…this is a room full of Catholics and Jews in New York City. “This is a layup for the Democratic candidate.”
Even Kamala’s own events no longer have anything to do with her. Last week’s campaign headlines were dominated by Bruce Springsteen and Beyoncé, who eventually appeared at a rally to endorse but failed to perform, again.
Have we heard anything new? anything? From Kamala herself? Or something that sounds honest? He has never actually responded to what he knew or when about President Biden’s cognitive decline.
He also couldn’t answer a simple question, at CNN’s town hall last week, about the one dream piece of legislation he’d love to pass.
To the political science professor named Carol who had dared to ask, we responded the following: ‘Well, there isn’t just one. I have to be honest with you, Carol. Um, there’s a lot of work to do, but I think maybe part of this, the point that I make about it is that we have to move beyond this era of politics and partisan politics. holding back what we need to do in terms of progress in our country.’
However, according to the Obamas, it’s our fault for not tolerating this stupidity.
And, of course, Kamala hasn’t been asked once about her husband, Doug, whose ex-girlfriend accused him of slapping her so hard that she turned around (in public, outside of an A-list gala) and leaving pregnant woman. nanny during her first marriage.
Instead, Harris returns, again and again, to her claim that she is a protector of girls and women, a claim that much of the mainstream media happily promotes.
Truly, this is a choice between the out-of-touch elites and the common people, but only one speaks clearly.