Doug Emhoff, our so-called Second Gentleman, is the complete opposite.
The explosive allegation that Kamala Harris’ husband once slapped an ex-girlfriend so hard she turned around, in public view outside a top-notch gala in France, has been met with complete silence from of the Harris campaign.
Because? How can the “good-natured” and “joyful” campaign (for a candidate who constantly reminds us that, as a prosecutor, she fiercely protected victims) back down from such a repugnant claim?
Perhaps they hope that if they ignore this, their servants in the national media will continue to do the same.
After all, MSNBC’s Jen Psaki, President Biden’s former press secretary, just conducted a meeting with Emhoff that lacked any resemblance to real journalism.
Doug Emhoff, our so-called Second Gentleman, is the complete opposite.
The explosive allegation that Kamala Harris’ husband once slapped an ex-girlfriend so hard that she turned around has been met with complete silence from the Harris campaign.
“His role,” Psaki gushed in an interview broadcast Sunday, “has reshaped the perception of masculinity.”
That’s one way of putting it.
Psaki already knew, as the Mail also revealed in August, that Emhoff had allegedly gotten his nanny, who was also his daughter Ella’s school teacher, pregnant while he was married to his first wife. But she doesn’t have any questions about his integrity? About the way he treats women?
“I’ve always been like that,” Emhoff told Psaki, a creepy smile on his ruddy face. “For me, supporting women is the right thing to do.”
Big applause, Doug.
Seriously, what kind of man brags about these things? He’s not someone who really likes and supports women, I promise you.
If Psaki and the rest of the left-wing media had actually looked into this story, they might have discovered that the babysitter has a much more disturbing claim about Emhoff and what happened to her baby, because Doug, the loose-lipped, he told the woman he allegedly hit. everything about that.
Yes, Doug allegedly described how he paid the babysitter $80,000 to leave, made her sign a confidentiality agreement, and dismissed her claims about how the miscarriage occurred.
But hey, strength through joy, people!
This guy has been successfully portrayed by the Harris camp, with a lot of help from the media, as everything he is not: a ‘wife man’ (whatever that means), an ally of women, and a crusader. against toxic masculinity, so proud of Kamala that he quit his job to support her when she became vice president.
Not because, as a lawyer, he represented an arms dealer selling to Afghanistan, Big Pharma, and a nightclub entrepreneur accused of sexual harassment and assault. You know, what a ‘wife man’ does: get rid of his responsibilities so as not to harm his spouse’s political future.
If only awkward women were so easy to contain.
“His role,” Jen Psaki gushed in an interview with Emhoff that aired Sunday, “has reshaped the perception of masculinity.”
Emhoff’s most recent accuser, whom the Mail calls by the pseudonym ‘Jane’, dated him in 2012. She reportedly told how he approached her, ‘love bombed’ her and introduced her to his son Cole , then a teenager, on their first date.
Jane reportedly found the whole thing, including Doug burning a cigarette at Cole, “strange.”
He also reportedly got the impression that Emhoff’s wife “had the upper hand” in their divorce and couldn’t understand why.
Then, two months after that first date, during a heady trip to a star-studded Cannes charity gala on May 24, Emhoff allegedly slapped Jane.
One of Jane’s friends, an elite New York City businessman, says he received a phone call from her moments later.
“It was hard to hear her because she was sobbing,” this friend told the Mail. “She told me she was with a boy and he hit her.”
Jane allegedly said she had offered the valet money to skip the long line outside the gala and had put her hand on his shoulder.
Emhoff apparently saw Jane’s gesture as “flirting” and, as a feminist man does, he allegedly slapped her hard.
“My impression is that he drank a lot,” said Jane’s businessman friend. ‘She was sobbing, but she wasn’t slurring her words. She told me she broke up with him that night.’
Jane also simultaneously told another friend, a New York-based lawyer, who described Emhoff’s alleged attack as sudden and unexpected.
“You would have thought this was a fairytale trip,” this source said.
Well, it looks like we finally meet the real Doug Emhoff, and he’s no hero to women.
Emhoff’s most recent accuser (pictured left), whom the Mail calls by the pseudonym ‘Jane’, dated him in 2012. She reportedly told how he got hot and ‘bombarded’ her love’.
Emhoff allegedly got his babysitter, who was also his daughter Ella’s (pictured), pregnant while he was married to his first wife.
Jane told her horror to another confidant, a senior corporate executive, in 2018. This woman also corroborated Jane’s story to the Mail, including the terrifying coda: Jane got into a taxi to escape Emhoff, but he allegedly entered the force. – which led her to call the New York City businessman for protection.
Doug Emhoff, feminist. What a lie.
Emhoff, Team Harris has long led us to believe, is a cuddly, sanitized, non-threatening beta.
It’s very likely, in my opinion, that this was a deliberate, cynical overcorrection: Emhoff has deliberately established himself as such a nice, good guy, with his clumsy stories about being so eager to get the great Kamala, woo her, and marry. her and just stay in the background, so that when, not if, accusations arose, they would be harder to believe.
It’s sinister.
This is the man who stands in stark contrast to Trump, who certainly has his own problems with women.
But only one of these men has been forensically investigated by the national media. Only one of these men represents a ticket that, as his wife often says, believes in the importance of “good values”, of being “honest”, of “not going back” to a time in which the plight of women was routinely ignored. .
Like the plight of Emhoff’s nanny, Najen Naylor.
Emhoff allegedly told Jane, who allegedly told this to her same friends, that, as told by Naylor, she believed Emhoff had been so “aggressive with her, yelling or whatever,” that she had an abortion. Emhoff reportedly disputed Naylor’s claim.
Doug allegedly described how he paid babysitter Najen Naylor (pictured) $80,000 to leave, made her sign a confidentiality agreement and dismissed her claims about how the miscarriage occurred.
A police report dated June 28, 2009, which lines up with the alleged pregnancy, shows that Los Angeles police were called to the home where Naylor lived at 8:14 p.m.
The call was designated as “priority level three”: “life-threatening emergency, lights and sirens on.”
The LAPD did not reveal any information about this emergency call: what happened, who was involved, or the outcome.
Emhoff has some questions to answer, as does Kamala Harris. The Mail asked his campaign for comment two days ago and received no response.
How can Harris, this self-proclaimed advocate for women, who loves to tell the story of how she saved her abused best friend and who self-righteously treated then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh as guilty in her Senate hearing despite there being no credible evidence against him? he—stay silent?
How long will it be until Harris finally has a substantive and challenging one-on-one interview? Will the New York Times or CNN treat these women as seriously as they treat Trump’s accusers? Will they accept Jane’s story as readily as they accepted those old memories of Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford or E. Jean Carroll? Or will they dismiss them as enthusiastically as they did Tara Reade’s sexual assault allegations against Joe Biden?
There is a precedent here. Harris’s predecessor, Hillary Clinton, defended Bill when he was accused of multiple sexual assaults (in fact, she still does), and that has always damaged his credibility among female voters.
The left’s favorite rallying cry is: “Believe all women.” Will they have the guts to do it now?
