Home Tech Is the diaper method in Twisters a real solution to massive tornadoes? Not exactly

Is the diaper method in Twisters a real solution to massive tornadoes? Not exactly

0 comment
Is the diaper method in Twisters a real solution to massive tornadoes? Not exactly

A storm that hit Dunlap, Indiana, during the Palm Sunday tornado outbreak of 1965 spawned twin tornadoes that circled around each other, just as we see in the film. Those twins were remembered in One of the most famous photographs in the history of climate.

The largest tornadoes are typically made up of smaller vortices that circulate within a single funnel. These multi-vortex tornadoes can be responsible for some of the worst damage in the aftermath of a terrible storm. The smallest suction vortices, as they are sometimes called, They have been documented by mobile Doppler radar with winds in excess of 300 mph.

Okay, the movie “twins” are possible, but what about their flaming tornado? During one of ‘Tornadoes’ Highlights: Multiple fireballs fill the stormy skies as a violent tornado tears through an industrial refinery. The tornado briefly absorbs the flames and becomes a formidable (albeit brief) fire tornado.

Fire whirls are real, though not exactly as depicted in the movie. Intense wildfires are well known for Creating your own climateIf conditions are right, some of these fires can cause thunderstorms over or near the fire.

While most fire devils form in a similar way to dust devils, the strong wind shear created by the fire itself can force these pyrocumulonimbus clouds to acquire the rotation necessary to generate a tornado.

National Weather Service meteorologists confirmed that a fire whirl formed during the Carr Fire near Redding, California, on July 26, 2018. Survey crews determined the whirlwind of fire produced winds stronger than 140 mph, equivalent to a strong EF-3 twister.

For all the The complex visual effects and scientific jargon that the actors throw around, the underlying question that storm chasers in Tornadoes The question we are trying to answer is simple: Is it possible to stop a tornado?

The plot follows protagonist Kate (Daisy Edgar-Jones) from her days as a meteorology student chasing tornadoes to her time as a licensed meteorologist who finds herself drawn back into yet another round of storm-tracking — for scientific reasons. (Fans of the 1996 film may chuckle at this nod to Bill Paxton’s character, Bill, who repeatedly says “I ain’t been back” before hopping in his pickup truck to chase a tornado.)

Kate’s mission in life is to stop tornadoes before they can cause death and destruction. Her research led her to try to launch a super-absorbent polymer — “like the kind used in diapers,” one character notes — into a tornado to absorb moisture and force the storm to wither and die out.

It’s an admirable goal, but it’s offset by the big screen.

Over the years, many theories have been formulated about how to stop storms before they can cause damage downwind. Absorbing moisture or, at the other end of the spectrum, “seeding” a storm to force it to rain are two possible options offered by would-be lightning rods. But the forces that generate huge thunderstorms and tornadoes are too great for humans to directly alter in any significant way. The brief introduction of diaper-grade absorbent material certainly wouldn’t solve the problem.

Reliable technology, advanced warning and emergency planning are the only foolproof methods to ensure safety in the event of a tornado. And ultimately, that has always been the goal of a Twister Movie. While they take artistic license, they still largely speak to the importance of science in understanding and preparing for storms. The rest is just the ride.

You may also like