Social media marveled at JD Vance’s ‘pretty eyes’ when Google searches for eyeliner exploded during his vice presidential debate against Tim Walz.
The high-stakes showdown between Republican Sen. JD Vance and Democratic Gov. Tim Walz comes with just 35 days until the election and polls show it could be one of the closest races in decades.
However, some in X who first saw Vance seemed fascinated by the Ohio senator’s eyes.
Even Democrats seemed captivated by Vance, with one writing, “I don’t know much about Vance, but I’m fascinated by his icy blue eyes,” before clarifying that he wouldn’t vote for him.
Another added: ‘I’m definitely having a girly moment… but JD Vance has such pretty eyes!!’
Social media marveled at JD Vance’s ‘pretty eyes’ when Google searches for eyeliner exploded during his vice presidential debate against Tim Walz.
Roosevelt Institute Director Elizabeth Panciotti posted the graph showing how much Google searches for “eyeliner” had increased during the debate.
However, out of nowhere, disgraced former congressman George Santos attempted to quell any rumors about the candidate’s use of makeup.
He wrote: ‘Vance does NOT wear eyeliner. I met him in person before he was a senator and I can confirm that he has long eyelashes and they cast a shadow on his waterline when the studios are full of lights… Grow up people!’
Tim Walz and JD Vance met Tuesday for their first and possibly only vice presidential debate in what could have been the last debate for both campaigns to make their case before the election.
The New York debate hosted by CBS News gave Vance, a freshman Republican senator from Ohio, and Walz, a two-term Democratic governor of Minnesota, a chance to introduce themselves, defend their running mates and go on the attack. against the opposite bill.
Each man pointed to the crises of the day as reasons for voters to choose their respective running mates for president, opening their vice presidential debate by addressing growing fears of a regional war in the Middle East and a natural disaster that has devastated the southeastern United States. Joined. .
Walz, responding to a question about whether he would support a pre-emptive strike against Iran since it has launched missiles at Israel, quickly went on to paint Donald Trump as too dangerous to the country and the world at an unstable time.
The high-stakes showdown between Republican Sen. JD Vance and Democratic Gov. Tim Walz comes with just 35 days left until the election and polls show it could be one of the closest races in decades.
“The bottom line here is that strong leadership is going to matter,” said Walz, Minnesota’s Democratic governor.
“And the world saw it on the debate stage a few weeks ago: A nearly 80-year-old Donald Trump talking about crowd sizes is not what we need right now.”
Vance, in his response, argued that Trump is an intimidating figure whose presence on the international stage is its own deterrent.
“Donald Trump really provided stability,” he said.
Both men found unity in the wake of Hurricane Helene, which devastated several states and caused massive flooding in North Carolina in particular.
Walz mentioned the devastation of the storm and talked about working with governors across the country, saying they don’t let politics get in the way of collaboration.
Vance said, “I’m sure Governor Walz joins me in saying our hearts go out to those innocent people.”
Walz accused Vance and Trump of villainizing legal immigrants in Vance’s home state.
However, out of nowhere, disgraced former congressman George Santos attempted to quell any rumors about the candidate’s use of makeup.
He pointed to the fact that Ohio’s Republican governor, Mike DeWine, had to send additional security forces to provide security for city schools after Vance tweeted and Trump amplified false claims about Haitians eating pets.
In a largely civil meeting, Republican Vance and Democrat Vance delved into the details of the politics of presidential candidates Trump and Kamala Harris during their clash in September.
Walz faced some uncomfortable questions, particularly when he was forced to admit that he “was wrong” about whether he had been in Hong Kong during China’s 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
