Home US A major government agency is reacting furiously after Trump’s overnight purge because it is posing a thinly veiled threat

A major government agency is reacting furiously after Trump’s overnight purge because it is posing a thinly veiled threat

0 comments
President Donald Trump's administration fired the independent inspectors general of more than a dozen major government agencies late Friday

The chairman of the inspectors general has hit back at President Trump’s mass firing of government watchdogs in a strongly worded letter, claiming the move is “legally insufficient.”

Late Friday night, the new leader announced the firing of 17 inspectors general, raising major concerns on Capitol Hill.

The White House has not publicly announced the massacre or provided any explanation for why it fired the officials charged with reviewing federal departments on issues such as the law and the use of taxpayer money.

IGs for the Departments of Defense, State, Transportation, Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development, Interior and Energy were all let go.

“It’s widespread carnage. “Whoever Trump puts in now will be seen as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system,” one of the unnamed fired officers told the newspaper. WashingtonPost.

But shortly afterwards, Hannibal “Mike” Ware, chairman of the Board of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency, challenged the decision in a thinly veiled threatening letter.

Addressed to Sergio Gor, head of the Presidential Personnel Office, Ware wrote: “I am writing in response to your email sent to me and other Inspectors General earlier this evening, in which you informed each of us that ‘as a result of changing priorities your position as Inspector General. . . will be terminated with immediate effect.

“As chairman of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE), I encourage you to contact White House counsel to discuss your intended course of action.

President Donald Trump’s administration fired the independent inspectors general of more than a dozen major government agencies late Friday

“At this time, we do not believe that the actions taken are legally sufficient to remove the presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed inspectors general.”

The Jan. 24 document further cites the 2022 amendments to the Inspector General Act of 1978 — which require the president to notify Congress 30 days before removing IGs.

According to the AfterWare is one of the officers fired Friday evening.

Others include Michael Horowitz of the Justice Department, an Obama appointee, and Mark Lee Greenblatt of the Interior Department.

Controversially, Joseph V. Cuffari Jr. of Homeland Security and an appointee of President Trump.

Last October, officials confirmed that Cuffari had misled the Senate during his nomination process and committed other misconduct during his five years in office.

Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers were left confused, saying the president may have violated a federal law that requires Congress to be given 30 days’ notice of such layoffs. Wall Street Journal.

Earlier on Saturday, Democrats emerged from 21 House committees signed a joint letter to defend the independence of the watchdogs and pointed out that removing them without notifying Congress is against the law.

Hannibal “Mike” Ware, chairman of the Board of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency, quickly challenged the decisions, saying their dismissals are “legally insufficient” in a strongly worded letter.

Hannibal “Mike” Ware, chairman of the Board of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency, quickly challenged the decisions, saying their dismissals are “legally insufficient” in a strongly worded letter.

1737858047 766 A major government agency is reacting furiously after Trumps overnight

“It's widespread carnage. “Whoever Trump puts in now will be seen as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system,” said one of the unnamed fired officers.

“It’s widespread carnage. “Whoever Trump puts in now will be seen as loyalists, and that undermines the entire system,” said one of the unnamed fired officers.

“Dismissing inspectors general without cause is contrary to good government, undermines the proper management of taxpayer dollars, and degrades the ability of the federal government to function effectively and efficiently,” the letter reads.

“We urge you to withdraw your unlawful action and fulfill your obligations to the American people.”

Senator Elizabeth Warren also turned to X to criticize the verdict, claiming that President Trump “paved the way for corruption.”

‘It’s a purge of independent watchdogs in the middle of the night. Inspectors General are charged with rooting out government waste, fraud, abuse and preventing misconduct.

“President Trump is dismantling the checks on his power and paving the way for widespread corruption,” she said wrote.

Ronald Reagan fired all existing IGs when he took office in 1981, but later reinstated half of them after an intense backlash.

Interior Department IG Mark Lee Greenblatt was among many fired

Interior Department IG Mark Lee Greenblatt was among many fired

The White House has not publicly announced the massacre or offered any explanation for why it fired the officials charged with reviewing federal departments on issues such as the law and the use of taxpayer money.

The White House has not publicly announced the massacre or offered any explanation for why it fired the officials charged with reviewing federal departments on issues such as the law and the use of taxpayer money.

An inspector general is an independent position that conducts audits, investigations and inspectors into allegations of waste, fraud and abuse.

They can be removed by the president or the head of the agency, depending on who nominated or appointed them.

While politically appointed leaders of agencies and departments come and go in each administration, an IG can stay and serve under multiple presidents.

Some inspectors general are appointed by the president, while others are appointed by the heads of their agencies.

They last indefinitely and usually cover governments to protect them from shifts in the political winds.

A president can remove them, but must notify both houses of Congress in advance.

You may also like