Harvey Weinstein all smiled Thursday as he entered the correctional court in Manhattan for a hearing prior to his upcoming criminal trial.
The offended mogul was photographed while sharing a laugh with his new lawyers before a judge ruled that one of his former lawyers, Jose Baez, had his legal & # 39; dream team & # 39; could leave.
Baez claimed that his relationship with Weinstein was sour when the offended mogul began to communicate with him through his other lawyers.
Judge James Burke then commenced Weinstein's criminal trial on 9 September, while the defendant dealt with a jar of butter and cheese.
Baez spoke to the media outside the courthouse shortly after the verdict and said: & I feel that I have won the lottery. Just kidding. & # 39;
Weinstein is charged with two counts of rape, a count of criminal sexual act and two counts of predatory assault for allegedly raping a woman in 2013 and sexually assaulting another in 2006.
Scroll down for video
Back in court: Thursday it was judged that Harvey Weinstein's criminal trial would begin on September 9 (Weinstein left the courtroom with Donna Rotunno on Thursday)
Mastermind: Weinstein spent the procedure playing a game of tic-tac-toe that ended in a draw (above)
The way they were: & # 39; Mr. Weinstein … has insisted on taking actions with which I have fundamental disagreements, & Baez wrote in a letter to the court (Baez and a plump Weinstein out of court in April)
& # 39; Weinstein has been involved in behavior that makes this representation unreasonably difficult to implement effectively and has insisted on taking actions with which I have fundamental disagreements, & Baez wrote in his letter to the court.
Judge Burke granted Baez & # 39; s request and at the same time brought two new lawyers from Weinstein – Donna Rotunno and Damon Cheronis – to declare in court that the rescheduled defense team would not lead to more delays in court.
That guarantee was to ensure that this was not just a list to postpone the upcoming process.
A significant part of the legal proceedings took place outside of hearing distance on Thursday, with Judge Burke Baez asking for the hearing before the court
He then spent five minutes with Baez, who successfully defended Casey Anthony and the late Aaron Hernandez during their murder cases.
When that was casually packed, Judge Burke called all the lawyers to the bank and then spent 10 minutes with both the defense and the prosecutors of the Manhattan District Office.
Weinstein had tried to reject the accusations against him at a hearing in December, but that motion was denied by the judge.
Oscar winner Marisa Tomei, Amber Tamblyn, Michelle Hurd, Jennifer Esposito and Kathy Najimy were just a few of the Hollywood stars sitting in the gallery for the court case that day.
The women all wore Time & # 39; s Up shirts.
& # 39; The court finds that there is no basis for the defendant's claim that he has been prosecuted or enforced in the lawsuit, or widespread inaccuracy in and around the presentation of the Grand Jury & # 39 ;, the judge said.
& # 39; In addition, there is no legal basis for the law enforcement behavior to be imputed to the public prosecutor. & # 39;
Weinstein had argued that the Grand Jury did not provide any evidence that the nature of the relationship between himself and his prosecutors would have shown.
These include e-mails he sent with one victim and texts from someone else thanking him for his help in securing a job.
One of the women was also advised to remove text messages from a law enforcement member.
The women chose not to speak before the session, but Najimy said: & # 39; I am here to hear the procedure and support the survivors. & # 39;
The judge ultimately decided that Weinstein would be confronted with rape charges, saying that the charge would not be rejected in the case.
The actresses who appeared before the court all did so in support of the victims and the Time & # 39; s Up movement.
The offended mogul wanted to get rid of the five remaining charges that had been filed against him, and in a letter earlier this month, his lawyer broke up against a comment from the public prosecutor.
& # 39; The suspect has a misguided and outdated view of how a rape victim should respond after being abused & & # 39 ;, prosecutor Kevin Wilson wrote in response to a letter to the court.
In the letter, Weinstein's lawyer wrote: & # 39; What is misled and outdated is the prosecutor's breathtaking statement that it was free to give the Grand Jury a knowingly incomplete, untrue and distorted picture of this case. to suppress the true facts of this case and thus of the Grand Jury critically relieving evidence that went directly to Mr. Weinstein's actual innocence of any criminal offense. & # 39;
The attack did not stop there and accused witnesses of the fact that they were not true.
& # 39; Contrary to what Mr. Wilson would like us to believe, the issue for this court is one of law and not political correctness, & # 39; read the letter.
"At the time they made their presentation to the Grand Jury in this case, the Prosecution (1) did not submit witness statements revealing material untruths told by the complaining witnesses and (2) deliberately chose not to provide evidence who immediately and subsequently continue contact with the alleged rapist, starting only a few hours after the alleged rape and then a few years later. & # 39;
Dream team redux: The new lawyers of the discrete mogul, Donna Rotunno (right) and Damon Cheronis (left rear), assured Judge Burke that this new shake-up would not postpone the trial (Diana Fabi Samson second right)
It's no joke: a substantial part of the lawsuit went out of hearing last Thursday, with Judge Burke Baez calling to court early in the hearing
Not a joke: Weinstein seemed a bit gloomy when he left the court after he had not defeated himself on tic-tac-toe
Earlier, Weinstein's lawyer filed a letter with the judge seeking to reject three of the charges against him during the summer.
Ben Brafman, the lawyer of Weinstein at the time, claimed in his letter to Judge James M Burke that the Manhattan Attorney's Office left evidence of the grand jury suing his client and giving four emails in which Weinstein and his prosecutor gave time spent with each other after her alleged attack.
He also claimed that the prosecutor told a friend that her relationship with Weinstein was a consensus.
Weinstein had previously submitted a motion to reject the charges against him in August, which included a number of emails sent by the same prosecutor between 2013 and 2017.
That woman, whose accusations against Weinstein resulted in accusations of rape in the first degree, rape in the third degree and predatory assault, wrote in the emails that Weinstein & # 39; the bar & # 39; is for the film industry and comments on his & # 39; smile and beautiful eyes.
In one of the emails Brafman sent, she also agreed to participate in a screening hosted by Weinstein, a few hours after she was allegedly raped by the mogul.
Documents show that the Weinstein office sent the woman an invitation for a film screening on the evening of March 18, 2013 – the day of the alleged attack.
The prosecutor replied: & # 39; I'll just continue (edited). Thank you (edited). & # 39;
The letter said that defense lawyers interviewed the girlfriend who confirmed that she had gone to the event with the accuser and that the two there had met Weinstein that night.
During that interview, the friend reportedly confirmed that Weinstein and the prosecutor at the time were in a & # 39; mutual sexual relationship & # 39; were and claimed that the prosecutor was trying to get her help to go after Weinstein, Brafman said.
Brafman argued that the emails, as well as the previous emails that he had submitted along with a previous motion, must have been seen by members of the grand jury.
& # 39; Had the Grand Jury noticed that (prosecutor) continued her friendship with Mr. Weinstein hours after the alleged rape (not only in the months and years thereafter, as evidenced by her emails), there is little chance that her story would have been accepted by the Grand Jury, & Brafman explains.
& # 39; This new e-mail proof makes (the prosecutor's) attempt even more serious because, as it turns out, the witness hours behind the alleged rape were with the prosecutor, but the prosecutor said nothing about being raped; instead, she chose to spend the evening with her boyfriend and her alleged rapist! & # 39;
Guess who: Gloria Allred (above) was also available for the court proceedings on Thursday and spoke to the media outside the courtroom
Witness to the defense: Weinstein had tried to settle all accusations against him in December, with no result
Brafman also argued that the prosecutor should have talked about Weinstein in glowing terms after an email from New Year's Day 2014 revealed that the friend thanked the producer for & # 39; the things you did for (prosecutor) in 2013 and for the things that you did for me too. & # 39;
Those things include invitations from Oscar parties, dinners, premieres, and auditions, according to documents.
An earlier email from October 2013 also shows that the same friend Weinstein said that the prosecutor worshiped him & # 39; & # 39 ;.
More than a year after the alleged rape, the prosecutor himself had an e-mail exchange with Weinstein to organize dinner.
On 9 July 2014, Weinstein emailed the woman with the question: & # 39; Are you there on Friday evening? I'm going in (edited). & # 39;
The prosecutor replied: & # 39; There is no one else I would be happy to catch up with as I understand. & # 39;
& # 39; I know I will be hungry, what's your timing? Do you have time for dinner? & # 39;
Responding to the December 7 filing, the New York Prosecutor, Kevin Wilson, stated that the letter from Brafman only repeats previous arguments made in earlier comments and disputed.
He argued that the findings did not constitute exculpatory information and claimed that the lawyer used unilateral, incomplete and inaccurate information.
& # 39; That the defendant has a misguided and outdated view of how a rape victim should react after being attacked does not change this reality & # 39 ;, Wilson wrote in a letter on Friday.
In August, Brafman asked to drop the Criminal Sex Act accusation for inconsistencies.
& # 39; Weinstein was indicted for an alleged act of forced oral sex by someone who claims she can't remember when it took place and only claims it was probably somewhere during a three-month period in 2004, almost fourteen years ago, & # 39 read the August motion.
& # 39; He was also charged for the rape of (e-mail prosecutor), whose extensive communication and contact immediately following the now claimed forced rape instead reflects a consensual, intimate relationship with Mr. Weinstein in an exchange of more than 400 warm, free and caring emails with an alleged rapist for more than four years after the alleged rape, never once in those 9 communications claiming to have ever suffered damage from Mr. Weinstein. & # 39;
The latest e-mail, from 2017, was less exuberant than that of Weinstein, which reads: & I love you, always do it. But hate you as a booty call. & # 39;
That came in response to an email from Weisntein in which he tried to make an appointment with the woman before going to an edited city.
He wrote that he could meet in the afternoon, and when the woman answered to ask for the address, Weinstein answered with the name of a hotel, even though he was in New York at the time.
The August submission stated that it was a year after that email, in February 2018, when & # 39; weinstein & # 39; s prosecutor & # 39; on the basis of information and conviction for the first time ever claimed to have submitted rape to a law enforcement authority. & # 39;
Weinstein was married to his now estranged wife Georgina Chapman at the time that all 40 emails were sent.
A month after she was allegedly raped by Weinstein in a downtown hotel, the alleged victim closed a short message with the words: & # 39; Thank you, and I hope to see you sooner (later) than later … & # 39;
The next day she said: & # 39; I appreciate everything you do for me, it turns out. & # 39;
Three days later, she expressed a desire to see Weinstein and overtake & # 39; &, a desire that she repeated again a few days later in an email submitted as evidence in the motion.
Another e-mail in which the woman is incredibly compliments to Weinstein was: & You have mastered story telling and are constantly tackling yourself and the competition. You are the bar. & # 39;
She then signed with: & # 39; Miss you big guy. & # 39;
A month earlier she had applied for a private audience at Weinstein with the message: & # 39; I had been hoping to share with you privately the direction I am going in life and to catch up with because it was a while ago. & # 39;
The woman also gave Weinstein her contact details after she changed her phone number
. (TagsToTranslate) Dailymail (t) news