Home Money GSK reaches £1.7bn settlement over Zantac cancer claims

GSK reaches £1.7bn settlement over Zantac cancer claims

0 comments
GSK will pay up to £1.7bn to resolve allegations that its heartburn drug Zantac caused cancer. (Pictured: Emma Walmsley, head of GSK)

GSK will pay up to £1.7bn to resolve allegations that its heartburn drug Zantac caused cancer. (Pictured: Emma Walmsley, head of GSK)

GSK shares rose more than 5 percent on Thursday after the The pharmaceutical giant said it will pay up to £1.7bn to settle thousands of legal cases claiming its heartburn drug Zantac caused cancer.

Ending a saga that has plagued it for half a decade, the British company has reached an agreement with ten law firms representing 93 percent of the pending cases in the United States.

The legal dispute has weighed on the company’s shares over fears it may have to pay more than £20bn in compensation.

All eyes will be on the London stock market when trading resumes today after GSK shares rose in New York last night following the historic upgrade.

GSK and rivals such as Pfizer and Sanofi have been at the center of a legal storm after Zantac was pulled from shelves in 2019 amid concerns that one ingredient, ranitidine, caused cancer.

A research note from Morgan Stanley analysts in 2022 said the move could cost the industry up to £35bn, with GSK facing liabilities of between £2.3bn and £20.7bn. A more recent analysis by Bank of America estimated an impact of £6 billion.

The company also agreed yesterday to pay £53.6m to settle a separate complaint brought by laboratory company Valisure, which is subject to final approval by the US Department of Justice.

GSK has not accepted liability in any of the agreements. It expects to report a £1.8 billion (£1.37 billion) hit to its third-quarter results.

“While there remains scientific consensus that there is no consistent or reliable evidence that ranitidine increases the risk of any type of cancer, GSK firmly believes that these agreements are in the best long-term interests of the company and its customers. shareholders, as they eliminate significant financial uncertainty, risk and distraction associated with protracted litigation,” he said.

‘The costs will be financed with existing resources. There are no changes to GSK’s growth agenda or R&D investment plans as a result of these agreements.’

money item html_snippet module" data-channel-color="money"> 1707393328 462 Home insurance prices up 13 in a year heres

Zantac was approved in 1983 and developed by GSK, becoming the world’s fastest-selling drug in 1988 and one of the first to surpass $1 billion in annual sales.

GSK and other companies pulled it from the market in 2019 after studies found that ranitidine created toxic levels of a substance called NDMA. NDMA is a chemical byproduct of many industrial processes, including rocket fuel production.

It is also common in small amounts in many foods, such as cured or smoked meats, fish, and beer, as well as in tobacco smoke.

NDMA is a “forever chemical,” meaning it does not degrade or break down naturally in the environment or in bodies.

Over time, it accumulates and human exposure increases. According to the World Health Organization, there have been no cases of cancer officially linked to Zantac, although thousands of patients claim otherwise.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ordered all ranitidine products off shelves in 2019 and urged patients to stop taking medications containing the ingredient.

money" data-version="2" id="mol-048a74f0-86da-11ef-be33-a5a2965b26cf" data-permabox-url="https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-13944517/GSK-strikes-1-7bn-deal-Zantac-cancer-claims.html" wp_automatic_readability="25">

GSK deal provides opportunity for Walmsley, says Alex Brummer

You could almost hear the sigh of relief when GSK, Britain’s cutting-edge pharmaceutical group, unveiled its agreement over claims that Zantac, its ulcer and digestive relief drug, caused cancer.

By the standards of cases brought by plaintiff lawyers in the United States, the £1.7bn settlement that resolves 80,000 (93 per cent) of the cases is cheap.

Early estimates from brokers suggested at one point that the cost to the entire pharmaceutical industry could have been more than £35bn, jeopardizing GSK’s future as an independent company.

The deal, revealed after the London market closed, is sure to be a boost to GSK shares, which rose in New York trading.

Although £1.7bn is a large figure, which will hit third quarter profits, it is far less than the more than £6bn shelled out by Johnson & Johnson this year over allegations that its famous talc products were carcinogenic. .

GSK has always been clear that there is no reliable clinical evidence to suggest that Zantac, also known as ranitidine, increases the risk of cancer.

The deal falls short of the £2.3bn settlement GSK signed with US authorities in 2010 over alleged behavioral deficiencies in the marketing and distribution of medicines.

The deal will allow GSK’s visionary CEO Emma Walmsley to focus more closely on its world-leading vaccines for respiratory diseases and its efforts to develop oncology treatments.

DIY INVESTMENT PLATFORMS

Easy investing and ready-to-use portfolios

AJ Bell

Easy investing and ready-to-use portfolios

AJ Bell

Easy investing and ready-to-use portfolios

Free Fund Trading and Investment Ideas

Hargreaves Lansdown

Free Fund Trading and Investment Ideas

Hargreaves Lansdown

Free Fund Trading and Investment Ideas

Fixed fee investing from £4.99 per month

interactive inverter

Fixed fee investing from £4.99 per month

interactive inverter

Fixed fee investing from £4.99 per month

Get £200 back in trading fees

sax

Get £200 back in trading fees

sax

Get £200 back in trading fees

Free trading and no account commission

Trade 212

Free trading and no account commission

Trade 212

Free trading and no account commission

Affiliate links: If you purchase a This is Money product you may earn a commission. These offers are chosen by our editorial team as we think they are worth highlighting. This does not affect our editorial independence.

Compare the best investment account for you

You may also like