Former Roger Stone assistant testifies to the grand jury who still hears witnesses, even after Mueller closed the office of a special council
- Roger Stone's former assistant, Andrew Miller, agreed this week to testify before a gran jury associated with Robert Ruser's investigation into Special Counsel Robert Mueller
- Miller fought the summons for a day, but was confronted with testimony or contempt for the court – which would probably end him in a D.C. prison.
- A lawyer who used to work for the Mueller team sent a letter to Miller's lawyer
- Aaron Zelinsky, the Mueller-affiliated lawyer, now works for the US law firm in Washington, D.C.
- He wants Miller to testify of his interactions with Stone from 2016 to the present
- Mueller closed his investigation at the end of March and repeated on Wednesday that the investigation of the special counsel for Russian interference had been completed
A former adjutant of political adviser Roger Stone agreed to appear before a grand jury who was previously associated with Robert Ruser's Russia investigation by Special Counsel.
The assistant, Andrew Miller, seemed to have given up the year-long opposition to a major jury's summons on Wednesday – the same day Mueller made public remarks about his probe.
During Mueller's podium statement at the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday, he announced that he would resign from the DOJ and said that the probe had drawn its conclusions and that it would not ask questions about the content of the report.
President Donald Trump declared & # 39; the case is closed & # 39; after Mueller & # 39; s comments.
Former assistant to Roger Stone (left), Andrew Miller (right), has agreed to testify before a grand jury associated with Robert Sueller & # 39; s Russian probe of Special Counsel
Miller opposed the subpoena for a day, but said on Wednesday that he was faced with the decision to testify or be dismissed for trial and confronted with a prison in Washington D.C.
In the last few days, Miller had to decide whether to testify before the Mueller affiliated grand jury or to fight against cooperation with the Supreme Court, where he could risk being sent to D.C. prison for contempt of the court.
"We decided to come to the grand jury on Friday," said Miller & # 39; s lawyer Paul Kamenar of the National Legal Policy Center. & # 39; I don't know what they want him to testify about. & # 39;
Kamenar, who is a conservative lawyer, works pro bono in Miller's case.
Miller gave the summons to testify, although the investigation by Mueller was completed in March.
The lawyer said he received an e-mail earlier this week from a lawyer who used to work on Mueller's team, Aaron Zelinsky, who now works for the American law firm in Washington, D.C.
According to Politics, Kamenar said in the letter that prosecutors wanted Miller to testify about his contacts with Stone from 2016 to now.
Stone, who was working on the Trump campaign in 2016, pleaded not guilty when he was charged in January for lying to Congress and the FBI for his interaction with WikiLeaks during the campaign.
He is confronted with five counts of false statements, one count of obstruction of an official procedure and one count of witness-tampering, and awaits a trial that was set for November.
A lawyer who used to work for the special council sent a letter to Miller's lawyer that the prosecutors wanted Miller to testify about his contacts with Stone from 2016 to the present. The lawyer beloved by Mueller now works for the American law firm in Washington, D.C.
Mueller spoke publicly at the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday where he reiterated that his report was final and said the DOJ did not sue a incumbent president with a federal crime
Stone was investigated by the special counsel for his contacts with WikiLeaks while working on the Trump presidential campaign in 2016. He did not plead guilty after being charged with lying to Congress and the FBI in January
Stone was one of the people who dealt with Mueller's probe, and in January the FBI raided his home in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, before dawn.
Mueller transferred the findings of his investigative test in a report of 448 pages to Attorney General Bill Barr at the end of March. Barr then handed an edited version of the report – where 10 percent had been misappropriated – to Congress and was made public.
The report found no evidence that Trump, or his associates, had conspired with the Kremlin to influence the 2016 presidential election.
He did, however, describe 10 & # 39; episodes & # 39; which were a possible reason for obstruction of the law.
Democrats claim that this is sufficient evidence to initiate a removal procedure against the president on the grounds of impeding an ongoing investigation.
Mueller said on Wednesday that he did not impose a crime on Trump because the DOJ did not sue a incumbent president with a federal crime.
Several Democrats, including many who participated in the Democratic Primary elections in 2020, took Mueller & # 39; s remarks as a signal that it was the job of Congress to take over from where the Russian probe stopped and blamed the president.
. (TagsToTranslate) Dailymail (t) news (t) Russia (t) donald-trump