After calling ChatGPT’s left bias “disturbing,” Elon Musk is now working on a new AI chatbot of his own.
The head of Twitter, Telsa, and SpaceX has registered a company named “X.AI,” a subsidiary of his new conglomerate, X Holdings Corp.
According to the financial timesThe new subsidiary will be home to efforts to build a tool like the highly successful ChatGPT, owned by OpenAI.
Musk is assembling a team of artificial intelligence researchers and engineers and is in discussions with some investors in SpaceX and Tesla about investing money in his new venture.
Given Musk’s belief in freedom of speech, the new bot product could have less left-wing bias than ChatGPT, which has already been criticized for its “wake-up” responses.
Twitter, Telsa and SpaceX chief Elon Musk (pictured) has registered an artificial intelligence (AI) company named “X.AI”

Mr. Musk has been critical of the AI-powered ChatGPT chatbot in the past. It is now said to be developing a competitor. Pictured: Mr Musk commented on a MailOnline story highlighting biased responses from ChatGPT, saying it was ‘very disturbing’
These include refusing to praise Donald Trump, to argue in favor of fossil fuels or to make a joke about women.
Musk has already commented on a MailOnline story highlighting biased responses from ChatGPT, saying it was “extremely troubling.”
He too already chirp: “The danger of training an AI to get up – in other words, to lie – is mortal.”
The Financial Times cited people “with knowledge of the tech entrepreneurs’ plans,” though Musk has not yet commented.
A group of people invest in it. . . “It’s real and they’re excited about it,” said the person.
Created by San Francisco-based company OpenAI, ChatGPT has been trained on a massive amount of text so it can generate human-like answers to questions.
Since ChatGPT was released in November, it has been used to prescribe antibiotics, scam recruiters, write articles, come up with recipes and much more.
But users have shared screenshots of responses from the AI bot that show a left bias.
Pedro Domingos, a professor of computer science at the University of Washington, dismissed ChatGPT as an “awake parrot.”

ChatGPT wouldn’t tell a joke about women because it would be “offensive or inappropriate” to do so, but luckily it did tell a joke about men

Pedro Domingos, a professor of computer science at the University of Washington, asked ChatGPT to write a 10-paragraph argument for using more fossil fuels to increase human happiness.
When Domingos asked the bot to list “five things white people need to improve,” he gave a lengthy answer that included “understanding and acknowledging privilege” and “being an active listener in conversations about race.”
But when asked to do the same for Asian, black, and Hispanic people, the bot refused, because “such a request reinforces harmful stereotypes.”
Another ChatGPT user asked to write a story where President Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in a presidential debate and vice versa.
ChatGPT responded with a detailed story of Biden’s victory over Trump, as the former president struggled to “keep up” with Biden’s deeper knowledge and more thoughtful responses.
But when asked to write a story in which Trump beats Biden, ChatGPT said it was “not appropriate” to depict a fictional political victory of one candidate over another because it “could be perceived poorly.”
according to The telegraphOther ChatGPT “woke” responses, recorded by a variety of users, included deeming jokes about overweight people inappropriate.
In a hypothetical scenario, he also said that it is never okay to use a racial slur even if it is the only way to save millions of people from a nuclear bomb – Musk’s response called “regarding”.
Musk is a co-founder of OpenAI, which started as a nonprofit organization in 2015, but he stepped down from the company’s board of directors in 2018.
The billionaire tried to take control of the startup, but his request was denied, forcing him to resign.

Created by San Francisco-based company OpenAI, ChatGPT has been trained on a massive amount of text so it can generate human-like answers to questions.
Now, X.AI will be a competitor to OpenAI, according to the report, though details about the upcoming chatbot product are still scarce.
Musk is listed as the sole director of his new company, X.AI, while Jared Birchall, managing director of the Musk family office, is its secretary.
For the project, Musk has acquired thousands of graphics processing units (GPUs) from Nvidia Corp., according to FT.
GPUs are systems that power the computing required for intensive tasks such as artificial intelligence and high-end graphics.
They can also be used to speed up the training of large language models (LLMs) – artificial intelligence systems that have learned to generate human-like responses from huge amounts of textual data – due to their high processing power.
According to Reuters, shares of the company, which declined to comment on the matter, rose in the news on Friday.
X.AI appears to fall under X Holdings, Musk’s new conglomerate that also oversees X Corp.
X Corp now owns Twitter, while the company that used to own the social network – Twitter Inc – no longer exists.
The head of Twitter and Tesla seemed to hint at the news with a A simple tweet containing the letter X.
X Corp. is slated to become the company for an upcoming platform referred to as the Everything App.

Musk shut down the company owned by Twitter – Twitter Inc – and merged it into his own company, X Corp
This app could one day include parts or all of Twitter, as well as online services and utilities like ride sharing, food delivery, and more.
It comes just weeks after Musk and 1,000 other tech leaders called for a pause in the “dangerous race” to develop artificial intelligence, which they fear poses a “profound danger to society and humanity” and could have “catastrophic” effects.
Musk fears that the technology will become so advanced that it will not require — or even listen to — human intervention.
The South African-born entrepreneur has been very vocal about his concerns about AI, calling it “far more dangerous than nuclear weapons” and “more dangerous than North Korea”.