A controversial American scientist, predicting a future in which IVF couples can determine the IQ of their children, emphasizes that his vision will become a reality in 2029.
Stephen Hsu, co-founder of Genomic Prediction at Michigan State University, told it Guardian: & # 39; Precise IQ predictors are possible, if not the next five years, the next 10 years for sure. I predict that certain countries will adopt them. & # 39;
It is a gray area, but the technology is there, although it is still much more complex and complicated than repairing hereditary diseases.
For the time being, experts hope no one will take the first step if ethicists try to set guidelines to prevent a second wave of eugenics, the controlled culture of desirable traits that Nazis tried to use.
But since the fall of the Chinese scientist He Jiankui's bomb attack last fall, he admitted that he had modified the DNA of twin girls to cure them from HIV, the global community of ethicists and geneticists struggling with how to prevent another.
Meanwhile, Genomic Prediction is steaming forward and parents are offering the very first & # 39; scorecard & # 39; of their embryos, demonstrating their potential baby & # 39; s risk of diseases, defects, stature and (a rough estimate of) intelligence.
Stephen Hsu, co-founder of Genomic Prediction at Michigan State University, emphasizes that, while currently not allowed in many countries, including the US and the UK, we will soon make ends meet
& # 39; Perhaps the lower 1 percent embryo grows into a tall person … even a scientist, but the chance is against & # 39 ;, Hsu said about the & # 39; low IQ & # 39; -embryo & # 39; s.
& # 39; I honestly feel that if we can calculate that score and find a true negative outlier, there is an ethical responsibility for us to report that. & # 39;
His words echo ominously those of the fathers of the eugenics movement in the UK and the US – who inspired the Nazis of the Jews.
Francis Galton, who in 1883 used the expression & # 39; eugenics & # 39; conceived and promoted, for example, said: & # 39; The production of families of children likely to degenerate must be stopped. & # 39;
Charles Davenport, a respected biologist at the end of the nineteenth century who taught eugenics at Cold Spring Harbor, believed that we considered the reproduction of the Germans, whom he saw as "sparing, intelligent, and honest". about Irishmen, whom he & # 39; quite mentally & # 39; found to encourage. defectiveness. & # 39;
The Supreme Court Judge, Oliver Wendall Holmes, ruled in 1927 that & # 39; three generations of Imbeciles are enough & # 39; when he agreed that a woman, Carrie Buck, should be sterilized because she is considered & # 39; mentally retarded & # 39; is considered to. Since then, Buck has been framed in such a way that the state of Virginia (and others) can be justified by forcefully sterilizing tens of thousands of people based on their perceived intelligence.
Editing or selecting embryos does not deprive people of their right to have children, but ethicists warn that it is an attempt to organize that decision.
It is not possible to adjust every aspect of our appearance and intelligence – only part of it is hereditary and written in our DNA.
And a decade ago the idea of adapting even part of it was absurd, or at least a very distant prospect.
IQ and appearance are determined by a mosaic of genetic factors, and we have never had the technology to put them all together to even come to a point where we could edit them.
But that has recently begun to change; scientists can now analyze how a gene affects every outcome to understand how it can be changed.
Genomic Prediction is actively working to speed up that process, especially with a focus on the traits that ethicists are so concerned about.
Hsu emphasizes that although it is not currently permitted in many countries, including the US and the UK, we will be coming soon.
& # 39; The IVF pioneers … were called monsters, Frankenstein's doctors; it was predicted that this baby would have health problems, & Hsu told the Guardian.
& # 39; I'm actually reassured about that. IVF is now fully normalized. Anyone who points their finger at (Genomic Prediction) should now go back to read those articles. & # 39;
. (TagsToTranslate) Dailymail (t) health