WhatsNew2Day
Latest News And Breaking Headlines

Coronavirus: US withdrawal from the WHO is hitting international cooperation, health experts say

WASHINGTON – America’s Withdrawal From The World Health Organization Will Hit International Cooperation Just When It’s Most Necessary To Counter The Persistent Covid-19 Pandemic, Experts Said After President Donald Trump’s Announcement On Friday (May 29 ).

“In my 30 years at WHO, I’ve never seen it attack so hard,” said Lawrence Gostin, a professor at Georgetown University, director of the WHO Collaborating Center on national and global health laws. As WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus tries to unite the world, “Trump blew up every appearance of international cooperation,” he said.

States must share and coordinate research and medical equipment to reduce, inter alia, the economic and social consequences of the pandemic. WHO is the key to coordinate this response.

“Since WHO plays a critical role in coordinating the international response, states should not deliberately take divisive action to undermine global health management,” said five global health scientists in a comment published Friday in the medical journal Lancet.

Mr Trump said the money that would go to the WHO would be diverted to “other global and urgent global public health needs,” but he did not specify which exactly.

Breaking ties with the global health service is also renouncing leadership that would diminish the influence of the superpower on global health policy and cede influence to China, critics said.

“If it withdraws from the WHO, the US will lose an important tool to shape global health guidelines, standards and practices. It would withdraw from the dominant forum for international health cooperation,” said Dr. Tom Inglesby, director. from the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security.

He added, “The US would withdraw from an important means of supporting the poorest countries in the world. For decades, the US has been a strong supporter of WHO’s efforts to help alleviate global health pests. Withdrawal would be a reversal of that international leadership position. “

The House’s Democratic-led Foreign Affairs Committee said it had launched an investigation into the decision to end funding for the WHO, calling it reckless.

Secretary of State Affairs Committee Eliot Engel, a Congressman from New York, said, “While the world is struggling with this devastating pandemic, breaking ties with the World Health Organization is like shutting down the hydrants in the middle of a fire.”

Even President of the Senate Health Commission Lamar Alexander, a Republican Senator from Tennessee, was against the president’s decision.

He said, “Certainly, there should be a good and hard look at mistakes that the WHO has made possible in connection with the coronavirus, but the time to do that is after the crisis has been resolved, not halfway there.”

Among other things, the US withdrawal could interfere with the clinical trials essential to vaccine development and make it more difficult to work with other countries to stop viruses before they reach the US, he added.

Trump has also been accused of blaming WHO’s missteps as a way to distract from the way his government handled the crisis at home, critics said, pointing to the weakness of his case against global health service.

House speaker Nancy Pelosi called the withdrawal an extraordinary pointlessness, saying, “Time and time again he blames others and refuses to take responsibility. Only with a coordinated global response will we defeat this virus.”

Mr. Trump’s letter to the WHO also contained factual inaccuracies, including an allegation that the WHO consistently ignored “credible reports of the spread of the virus in Wuhan in early December 2019 or even earlier, including reports by the medical journal Lancet” .

The Lancet made a statement in which the President’s claim was factually inaccurate, noting that the first articles about Covid-19 were published on January 24 and acknowledged that there was a human-to-human transmission.

Trump had also originally given the WHO 30 days to commit to rapid reforms or the US would reconsider its membership in the organization. On the eleventh day, just a third of the ultimatum, the president retired anyway, they noted.

Mr. Engel said: “The WHO is only as strong as its members. It follows the course set by the leading votes.

“If the President were truly concerned about China’s influence at WHO, he would strengthen America’s role rather than undermine the institution best equipped to summarize a unified global response,” he added. he is ready.

(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.async=true;
js.src = “http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=263116810509534”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

Comments
Loading...