California cafe owner adds fee for mask wearing and pledges to donate proceeds to domestic violence victims

0

Those used to wearing a mask everywhere may be in for a nasty surprise when they decide to pay a visit to the Fiddleheads Café in Mendocino County, California.

A sign on the door announces a new policy at the breakfast and lunch restaurant this week: Those wearing masks will pay an additional $ 5 fee, with an additional $ 5 (in small text) if you are caught bragging about it receiving a coronavirus vaccine.

Owner Chris Castleman said it stemmed from his belief that the restrictions put in place to prevent the spread of the coronavirus have not only been unsuccessful, but also destructive.

The response to the policy has been mixed.

A new policy of wearing masks in a California cafe has drawn attention. The owner says he wants to send a message that coronavirus restrictions may have caused more harm than good

“It seems like people love or hate it,” Castleman told the Daily Mail. “I mean, the idea is that I think it is time for all these ineffective government measures to start paying attention to the collateral damage they have jointly caused.”

Between lockdown mandates, indoor capacity constraints and the economic ramifications of pandemic policies, Castleman said the government mandates have exacerbated conditions leading to increased drug abuse, suicides and domestic violence.

Proceeds from the additional costs, he said, would go to domestic violence charities.

Fiddlemans Cafe owner Chris Castleman has battled the limitations of the corona virus in the past.  He said he will donate proceeds from mask wearing fees to domestic violence nonprofits

Fiddlemans Cafe owner Chris Castleman has battled the limitations of the corona virus in the past. He said he will donate proceeds from mask wearing fees to domestic violence nonprofits

There’s no straight line from wearing a mask to domestic violence, but I see it as part of a giant play that forces people to stay at home, lift their freedoms, quit their jobs, and put them in situations of despair forces. ‘

While there is a general consensus among health experts that wearing masks helps prevent the spread of COVID-19, some evidence shows that, particularly at the start of the pandemic, lockdown orders contributed to a spike in domestic violence.

For example, in Castleman’s Mendocino County, Project Sanctuary, a local domestic violence and sexual assault nonprofit and nonprofit support organization, reported a 121 percent increase in calls to its crisis line during the first three months of the pandemic compared to the same period the previous years, according to the Ukiah Daily Journal reported.

After a few more weeks, the calls for help in many areas have stopped, which the New York Times reported was probably a bad sign, given that the victims of abuse gave up.

Castleman is no stranger to voicing his opposition to the government’s restrictions on the coronavirus.

In particular, Castleman believes lockdown orders have caused more human misery than the virus itself

In particular, Castleman believes lockdown orders have caused more human misery than the virus itself

In April, he presented a promotion in his cafe offering a 50 percent discount to customers willing to throw away their masks. SFGate reported, and in June 2020, Fiddleheads was hit with two $ 10,000 citations for violating county health regulations requiring his employees to wear masks. Rather than comply, he closed his store, according to the North Bay Business Journal.

But after a year of rolling lockdowns in the state, many of those restrictions may disappear.

While the California state government reports that more than 50 percent of the population has been vaccinated, Governor Gavin Newsom announced on May 21 that the state would fully reopen its economy from June 15, ending capacity limits and social distance requirements. Wearing a mask will be in accordance with Centers For Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and requires only unvaccinated people to wear it.

For Castleman, he believes that the full extent of the damage these policies have caused will not be fully known for some time.

“I hope they really study it and look at the long-term impact of those decisions,” he said. ‘… I don’t think anyone could argue that the restrictive measures had no negative impact on society, and I think we’ll see those consequences in the next decade. I hope we can move to a brighter future and never will again. ‘

.