Body language experts have shared the “gestures” that may have lost Kamala Harris the presidential election, from her stance that “implied inner weakness” to her “passive-aggressive and sarcastic smile.”
Kamala, 60, has spent the past four months campaigning across the country in a bid to become the 47th president of the United States.
But on Tuesday it was revealed that he had lost to Donald Trump and, according to UK-based body language analyst Judi James, some of his moves may have put off voters.
He analyzed the gestures Kamala used throughout her campaign exclusively for DailyMail.com and broke down which ones may have contributed to her “downfall.”
Judi noted that the public tends to be “wary” of someone who looks like they’re “doing well” but will gravitate toward “someone who shows flaws,” which is why some people may have been more drawn to Donald, 78. , which for Kamala.
Body language experts have shared the “gestures” that may have lost Kamala Harris the election, from her stance that “implied inner weakness” to her “sarcastic smile.”
“Our subconscious picks up many non-verbal traits, adds them to the verbal message, and begins to draw conclusions,” he explained.
‘Sensation is a huge factor in electoral success or failure. “A political leader has to make us feel a certain way to win our vote.”
According to Judi James, a body language analyst based in the United Kingdom, some of Kamala’s moves could have deterred voters.
Judi explained that Kamala’s stance may have “implied inner weakness or lack of determination.”
He noted that the vice president often used the “broken wing wrist position,” which is when someone’s “hand hangs from bent, weak-looking wrists.”
“When we see our politicians looking powerful and strong, we like to see an extension of power that carries the line of strength from the chest and shoulders to the tips of the fingers,” Judi shared.
“It often seemed like she was drying her nail polish when she should have been using fist or staff rituals to imply authentic knowledge and power.”
The expert noted that Kamala often took “long pauses” to “look at the audience” during her speeches, a “technique often used by great speakers” to warn people that “something really great was about to come out of her.” his mouth.” ‘
But Judi said Kamala often failed to follow the movement with something “profound,” and theorized that her incorrect use of the gesture could have made her “messages” seem “incongruous.”
He analyzed the gestures Kamala used throughout her campaign exclusively for DailyMail.com and broke down which ones may have contributed to her “downfall.”
Judi explained that Kamala’s stance may have “implied inner weakness,” adding: “She often looked like she was drying her nail polish when she should have been using her fists.”
Judi also claimed that Kamala’s interactions with her husband, Doug Emhoff, were a “low point,” explaining that “Doug’s non-verbal skills defined him as a dominant alpha male.”
“Kamala loves word salads and talks a lot of dialogue that barely gets to a point,” he said.
‘The combination of ‘important’ body language and word salad started to feel like cheating. When we sense a discrepancy, we start looking for clarification or we simply tune out.’
Judi also claimed that Kamala’s interactions with her husband, Doug Emhoff, were a “low point.”
“Doug’s non-verbal skills defined him as a dominant alpha male who came to congratulate but also take control over his woman,” he analyzed.
‘His protective arm around her shoulders, his puffed out chest and the way he led her around the stage as if she had been borrowed.
“In his last speech, he even bent an arm to let them go with her as if he were taking her to his retirement.”
During the debate between Donald and Kamala in September, the vice president was often seen openly laughing at the claims he made.
And Judi added that laughter can “produce negative responses” from viewers if used at the wrong time.
Judi said that “his puffed out chest and the way he led her around the stage” looked like she “had been on loan.”
During the debate between Donald and Kamala in September, she was often seen laughing, and Judi said that laughter can “produce negative responses” from viewers.
“Laughing too much and too often when the audience feels they are suffering will produce negative responses,” he warned.
“A reputation as a comedian can be a positive trait, but the visual illustration of that sense of humor should be used judiciously.”
A second body language expert called Jamie Wall He also spoke to DailyMail.com about Kamala’s moves and reiterated Judi’s claims.
A second body language expert named Jamie Wall (seen) also spoke to DailyMail.com about Kamala’s movements.
Jamie theorized that the 60-year-old was trying to use “humor to diffuse tension,” but added that laughter can “create an emotional imbalance” and “undermine important issues” if used at the wrong time.
He also noted that Kamala often had a “sarcastic smile” on her face when referencing her competitor, which he explained may have put some people off.
“Excessive sarcasm can create a negative environment, making interactions feel passive-aggressive,” she shared.
Additionally, Jamie noticed that Kamala often rested her chin on her hand, which he said made her seem “doubtful about the topic at hand.”
“In negotiations or discussions, it is crucial to be aware of how those non-verbal cues can be interpreted,” he added.
Use this gesture carefully. While it can indicate critical thinking, it can also suggest uncertainty, which can affect the overall tone of the conversation.