Florida researchers discovered that people quickly learn that cooperative behavior will not benefit them, and begin to worry less about others.

It may not surprise many residents of big cities, but living in a big city can make you feel bad.

Researchers say that it can lead people to turn off their natural karma & # 39;

They discovered that people quickly learn that cooperative behavior will not benefit them, and they begin to worry less about others.

Florida researchers discovered that people quickly learn that cooperative behavior will not benefit them, and begin to worry less about others.

Florida researchers discovered that people quickly learn that cooperative behavior will not benefit them, and begin to worry less about others.

The question that reveals how nice you really are

Researchers say the key question that can reveal how kind you are to strangers is:

Would you tip your waitress if you knew you would never go back to her restaurant?

For most people, the answer is probably because that is how most of us are socialized.

But, what if you knew that the waitress would never know if you left a tip?

Without the incentive of approval, would you still be generous?

"Actually, we're walking with Stone Age minds," said Michael McCullough of the University of Miami.

"We have a natural karma built into us because our minds have evolved to think that what is really going on happens."

"Our minds still think that treating all the people we know could have consequences, that all the people we meet who are bad or good will give us back the money."

The researchers studied the anonymous interactions and discovered that humans deactivate their automatic inclination to share relationships with strangers in some situations.

McCullough said the study could explain why people in big cities have a reputation for being more rushed and less friendly to strangers than people in small cities.

"I think what this study says is not that generosity to strangers is part of what humans evolved, but that we evolved in a world where there were really no strangers," McCullough said.

& # 39; We knew everyone. They knew us, and if we did not know everyone directly, we knew someone they knew, so if we were bad with someone, they could say: "That's a terrible person."

"Now we live in cities with millions of people and you can legitimately meet a stranger and say, I'll never see that person again, and I get away with a bad deal."

"That is less true in small cities, where almost everyone knows everyone."

McCullough said the study could explain why people in big cities have a reputation for being more rushed and less friendly to strangers than people in small cities.

McCullough said the study could explain why people in big cities have a reputation for being more rushed and less friendly to strangers than people in small cities.

McCullough said the study could explain why people in big cities have a reputation for being more rushed and less friendly to strangers than people in small cities.

Researchers say the key question that can reveal how kind you are to strangers is Would you tip your waitress if you knew you would never go back to your restaurant? & # 39;

The study, & # 39; Experience with anonymous interactions reduces intuitive cooperation & # 39; shows that the & # 39; cognitive shortcut & # 39; That we have built in our brains to be generous or fair can be easily disabled if we realize that there will be no return, either positive or negative. negative.

& # 39; People noticed, & # 39; What I do really does not matter. It has no social consequences. No one is going to pat me on the back if I'm generous. Nobody will think I'm stingy if I'm not, "said lead author William McAuliffe.

Then, when they return, they do not act on that cognitive shortcut because they have learned that the same rules do not apply.

HOW WAS THE STUDY DONE

The researchers exposed 200 volunteers to a social environment without incentives or punishment for the way they treated others, and followed how their behavior changed over time.

The volunteers, who went to the lab in small groups on two separate occasions a month apart, were asked to play three games that required them to make decisions about investing money and sharing the unexpected benefits with others in the room, and finally with a charity .

But, sitting on the consoles with headphones, the participants did not interact with each other. They made all their decisions and collected all their profits anonymously and privately.

During the first round, the study showed that the participants behaved predictably: acting in accordance with the habits that shape their daily experiences, shared unforeseen gains with strangers and shared almost half of their profits with charity.

But on their return visit about a month later, they were not so generous, sharing, on average, about 20 percent less.

.